The Sepoy Mutiny Of 1857 Research Essay

The Sepoy Mutiny Of 1857 Essay, Research PaperAs with any struggle or contention there are ever two sidesto the argument, and the events in India during 1857 are surely noexclusion. Given the state of affairs in India during the 19th centuryit is barely surprising that such a polarization of sentiment existssing the context of the rebellious events during that twelvemonth. TheBritish being in control of the subcontinent and their sense ofhigh quality over their Indian topics, would of course seek todownplay any Acts of the Apostless of rebellion. While the Indian topics on the othermanus would arguably wish to overstate and over emphasise theimportance of these events, as a agency of advancing the patriotcause for self finding. The truth of the events themselves, doesit lie towards the British history or the Indian pro chauvinisticside, or could at that place be a certain sum of truth in both sides of theargument.

Metcalf in his history citations three incontestable factors behindthe eruption of rebellion in 1857. Primarily he sees `accumulatinggrudges of the Sepoy Army of Bengal & # 8217 ; as the most of import factor.The grounds behind this `deterioration of morale & # 8217 ; amongst the ground forces balladwith several grounds. Much of the Sepoy ground forces was comprised of`Brahmins and other high caste Hindus & # 8217 ; who assisted in advancing a`focus of sedition & # 8217 ; . The `generally hapless criterion of Britishofficers & # 8217 ; , plus the deficiency of betterment to the overall place ofthose work forces functioning in the ground forces besides increased the degree of tenseness. Atthis point it should be remembered that the `Bengal Army differed fromthose of Bengal and Madras & # 8217 ; , as the Bombay and Madras ground forcess took noportion in the rebellion of 1857. But the more marked military factorwas the deficiency of British military personnels in the `Gangetic field & # 8217 ; meant that manycountries were `virtually denuded of British troops & # 8217 ; .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

These military grudges which although important were nonthemselves plenty to motivate rebellion, as it took a sensed onslaughton the Sepoy spiritual establishments to trigger of the rebellion. Theforemost of these perceived menaces was that the British authorities wasfixing to level the caste system and `convert them forcibly toChristianity & # 8217 ; . Although non based on fact the actions of some `piousBritish officers did nil to chase away & # 8217 ; the rumor to the reverse.Added to this British lassitude was the Brahmans who tended to be`peculiarly alert for possible menaces to their faith andcaste & # 8217 ; .Second, the debut in 1857 of the `new Enfield rifle & # 8217 ;with its distinguishable ammo, which required the slug to be `bittenbefore lading & # 8217 ; . Rumor that the lubricating oil used on the slugs waseither from the fat of cowss or hogs, which either proved `sacred toHindus & # 8217 ; or `pollution to Muslims & # 8217 ; , was interpreted as assailing at thenucleus of the Hindu and Muslim spiritual beliefs. These rumors unlikethose sing the transition to Christianity and dismantlement of thecaste system, did turn out to hold a factual footing, as the Britishauthorities `withdrew the obnoxious lubricating oil & # 8217 ; . This tardy actionproved futile as the harm had already been done.

However this lone histories for the military facets of theoriginating which display the version of events `accepted in officialcircles [ as ] fundamentally army mutinies & # 8217 ; . This version preferred by theBritish fails to admit the degree of `widespread agitation among thecivilian population & # 8217 ; , who saw much of the British authorities & # 8217 ; s actionsas amounting to interference and contempt for the `long establishedregulations and imposts & # 8217 ; .Disraeli saw the causes of the rebellion as non being the`conduct of work forces who were & # 8230 ; the advocates of general discontent & # 8217 ;amongst the Bengal ground forces. For Disraeli the root cause was the overalldisposal by the authorities, which he regarded as holding`alienated or alarmed about every influential category in the state & # 8217 ; .Yet other British saw the overall societal state of affairs andauthorities disposal as holding no consequence in doing the rebellion.

For functionaries like Sir John Lawrence the `immediate cause of therebellion & # 8217 ; was the concerns held by Sepoys over the new ammo forthe Enfield rifles. However, he sees this as merely the triggerincident, with the root cause being the long term decrease insubject in the ground forces and the hapless criterion of officers in bid.The British point of view is to see the events of 1857 as amutiny. This is right as there was a mutiny by subdivisions of themilitary, yet this fails to include the subdivisions of the civilianpopulation who besides engaged in civil agitation.

For most of the Britishauthors and perceivers of the events, they are agreed in naming it amutiny because of the weaknesss of the ground forces, in footings of subject andbid.The term mutiny besides conjures up images of comparatively little,disorganised and non really widespread activities of noncompliancetowards British authorization. This is a more accurate description of theevents given that the `whole of India did non take part in therebellion & # 8217 ; . Added to this the `large organic structures of Punjabi Sikh military personnels[ who ] served under British command & # 8217 ; and some `of the Indian princes & # 8217 ;it seems difficult to warrant the term used by the Indian patriots todepict the events of 1857.Although non accepted by all Indian historiographers, the traditionalIndian nationalist position of the events of 1857 are that it was non asthe British believe, a series of stray and uncoordinated mutinies.

It was a war of independency, the first act by Indians to derive egoregulation. That twelvemonth represented a turning point in which the `nationalistfeelings, long suppressed by the British business, flared intoforce & # 8217 ; . For half a century after 1857 the composing on the rebellionwere fundamentally confined to British perceivers and bookmans.The first nationalist reading appeared in 1909. Savarkaris really passionate in his pro nationalist stance, he treats withcontempt the British averment of the lubricated slugs as triping the`war & # 8217 ; . He inquiries that if the slugs were the cause why did thelikes of `Nana Sahib, the Emperor of Delhi, the Queen of Jhansi & # 8230 ;articulation in & # 8217 ; . To Savarkar the fact that these persons participated andthe contending continued after the `English Governor General issued aannouncement & # 8217 ; to retreat the offending greased slugs, shows in hismind the battle was for an India free from British regulation. To Savarkarthe existent cause was the actions of the British in holding `committed somany atrociousnesss & # 8217 ; .

As noted by others was the aim of the Indians to halt theBritish in their alleged `wicked desire to destruct our sanctum faith & # 8217 ; .The patriots sought to `restore province protection to Islam andHinduism & # 8217 ; . Savakar & # 8217 ; s rhetoric is of a slightly extremist patriotpoint of view, claiming God on the Indian side and national support todrive the European encroacher from the sub-continent. The ability towrite old ages after the event assists in Savakar & # 8217 ; s ability to usethe nationalist sentiments of his modern-day early twentiethcentury run to advance this event from half a century earlier asthe foundations of the nationalist motion.Another position by Joshi adds to the nationalist image of theenormous damaging consequence the British had on India & # 8217 ; s people andcivilisation.

Joshi regards the events of 1857 as surely being awar, but he sees it as being more than a war of independency, it was a`social revolution & # 8217 ; . To both Joshi and Savakar the British werestamp downing the truth of the rebellion, the British `exaggerated andintentionally misrepresented the function played & # 8217 ; by spiritual factors.They used this statement as a agency of farther control and repressionof the Indian people after 1857. Joshi is extremely critical of the`English educated Indian intellectuals & # 8217 ; for keeping the Britishprevarication, who he regards as holding `swallowed this imperialist thesisuncritically & # 8217 ; .One position which leans towards the side if construing the eventsof 1857 as a war of independency, instead than a mutiny, is that ofGupta. Although he takes a less nationalist and morebalancedattack.

He argued the name of the events, which is what parties forboth sides have continuously argued over, are entitled to be calledthe `Great Indian Outbreak & # 8217 ; . For Gupta the name is non being proIndian patriot in the description of the events, which he regardsas holding `possessed the trademarks of a truly national rebellion & # 8217 ; . Hesought to compare these events on an equal terms with European eventsof a similar nature. `If the limited and unfruitful consequences of 1830and 1848 in Central and Southern European states have been regardedas national rebellions & # 8217 ; , Gupta sees the Indians as justifiably givingthe events of 1857 a similar rubric.The two histories by Joshi and Savarkar are surely for thepro-nationalist motion, who of class would wish to portray theevents of 1857 in a visible radiation that was directed towards the patriotmotion & # 8217 ; s aims. Gupta although evading to this point of view is farless pro patriot and more balanced in his attack.As Metcalf points out the `most permeant bequest of the mutinycan be found possibly in the domain of human dealingss & # 8217 ; . Quite merelythe manner in which the British and Indians interacted, was particularlythe manner the British felt towards the Indians altered markedly.

While there is no inquiry refering the British as the swayers ofIndia for a century, the mode of disposal prior to the mutinyof 1857 was less as the function of master. After the mutiny it becamemuch sterner with the British playing as `clearly an busying power,garrisoning a hostile land & # 8217 ; . The British saw the demand to cut down thehazard of a 2nd rebellion and to cut down the chance the `Governmentof India adopted the policy of making division and disunion in thecivil ranks & # 8217 ; .

In footings of interaction the mutiny saw `the romanticism oforientalists and the optimism of reformists [ giving ] manner to apessimistic stance that emphasised military security and cautiouspolicies & # 8217 ; . This saw the British impetus `into insular smallcommunities & # 8217 ; . As portion of this different military and administrativeattack there was a important restructuring of the military, `theIndian component in the ground forces was drastically reduced ( from 238,000 in1857 to 140,000 in 1863 ) and the European portion increased ( from 45,000to 65,000 ) & # 8217 ; . As portion of restructuring forces Numberss, ratios wereintroduced where in the `Punjab the ratio of British to native military personnelsshould usually be one to two, & # 8230 ; [ while ] in Bombay and Madras & # 8230 ;one to three & # 8217 ; . In an effort to further cut down any opportunity of anothermutiny happening the `native Artillery was abolished & # 8230 ; [ and ] thecorps of Bengal, Madras and Bombay Artillery and Engineers wereamalgamated with the Royal Artillery and Royal Engineers & # 8217 ; .The decennaries prior to the mutiny saw no efforts by the Britishto sort the Indians into `racial classs or rank them assuperior or inferior & # 8217 ; . But by the center of the 19th century thedivisions of `race was a popular subject in Victorian England & # 8217 ; .

Theconstruct of high quality and lower status reached such degrees that the`concept of lasting racial high quality & # 8230 ; underlay much ofpost-Mutiny British thought about India & # 8217 ; .The footing for these positions were no longer regarded as merelybeing `emotional sentiment, it was a scientific fact & # 8217 ; , or moreaccurately pseudo-science. While the theories of racial high qualitywere nil new to the people of Victorian England. The raciallybased thoughts were given much greater acceptance to those who supportedthem, by the `publication in 1859 of Charles Darwin & # 8217 ; s, Origin of theSpeciess [ which ] accelerated this displacement from the commonalties of thehuman race to a distinction of races & # 8217 ; .

These racially based beliefs in high quality and lower status werethe footing, for the protagonists of such beliefs, in the ground behindthe British triumph in 1857, as the `white race was dominant becauseit was more advanced and adaptable & # 8217 ; . The moves by the British towardsadmiting the assorted racial groups in India and hence thequalities of each was an country which holding been neglected before themutiny became an country of acute involvement. The `martial races became aconcern instantly after the eruption of the Sepoy Rebellion & # 8217 ; . TheBritish disposal the `Peel Commission concluded & # 8230 ; had beenunaware of the true soldierly properties possessed by assorted Indiancultural groups & # 8217 ; .

The willingness of the British to acknowledge to the goodqualities of certain cultural groups showed that, although they did nonrespect such groups as being anyplace near the peer of the white race.They could be categorised as being the superior members of an inferiorrace. The findings of the enquiry saw the British topographic point certainracial groups out of favors, while supplying greater credence ofothers.The Brahmins were characterised as `scheming and dishonest & # 8217 ; , andit was the `high caste Hindus of Oudh and neighboring countries & # 8230 ;adjudged responsible for the undermining of subject of the sepoysof the Native Army & # 8217 ; . While others like the `Guhkas, Sikhs, Marathasand Rajputs & # 8230 ; understood the significance of honor, and responsibility & # 8217 ; , hencethe British decision makers saw these races as being `India & # 8217 ; s genuinelysoldierly peoples & # 8217 ; .

The enlisting into the ground forces of members of thesesocietal groups was made authorities policy and `a series of enchiridions onthe soldierly races [ produced ] for the benefit of enrolling officers & # 8217 ; .Aside from the overall impairment in dealingss between theBritish and their Indian topics after the rebellion, there was besidesan impact on the Indians themselves. With the Muslims losing much ofthe influence and power they held before the rebellion, and theHindus make fulling the vacuity left by the Muslims. While the Britishattitude changed radically towards the Indians the `most bitter andwidespread ill will was reserved for the Muslim community & # 8217 ; . They wereblamed by the British for much of the rebellious activity, which theBritish saw as an effort to `restore the authorization of the Moghulemperor & # 8217 ; .Because `Muslims stood prejudiced against western instruction & # 8217 ;they `had to stay in the background for some clip & # 8217 ; , while the Hinduswho were more favorable in the acceptance of this western manner ofinstruction and larning English benefited under the authorities.

Anillustration which shows how the Muslims declined so to a great extent and the Hindusbenefited after the mutiny, is in the instance of `judicial placesunfastened to Indians & # 8217 ; . `Although Muslims comprised merely 12 per cent of thepopulation in the North Western Provinces, they held 72 per cent ofplaces & # 8217 ; prior to 1857. The station 1857 effects saw thisdisproportional portion of judicial place diminish to a state of affairswhere in `1886 they could claim merely 9 stations out of a sumof 284 & # 8242 ; . This state of affairs of a Muslim diminution in influence had long termeffects on the Muslim community right up until the early portion of the20th century.As each side of the argument is so fixed in their sentiment on thistopic that no consensus of all time seems likely to be reached. For theIndians the events assist in heightening the nationalist subject offring the sub-continent of the British. To the patriots theevents of 1857 are the first measure in a procedure that took ninety old agesto accomplish the end of an India ruled by Indians.

However the groundsof the events clearly comes down on the side of the British sentiment.The events were non a war of independency but a military andcivilian mutiny.Given that the `entire South of India took no portion in therebellion & # 8217 ; it seems impossible to warrant the claim that the eventswere a war of independency. Added to this, the aidprovided by certain elements of Indian society to the British furtherreduces the patriot claims. The deficiency of cardinal co-ordinationamongst the Rebels barely inspires assurance in them prosecuting in astruggle to derive independency. Clearly the argument comes closer to theBritish point of view of 1857 being a twelvemonth of mutinies in the Indiansub-continent, and non the first efforts by the Indians to seekindependency.


I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out