Sister Carrie Essay Research Paper I think
Sister Carrie Essay, Research PaperI think it is really hard to specify the exact character of Dreiser? s “ Sister Carrie ” , and his original purpose. I would state, “ as many eyes, so many sentiments ” , so no admiration there are different attacks and readings towards the novel which is influenced non merely by the reader? s reading or personal experience, but besides by their peculiar doctrine of life every bit good as cognition about the historical background. “ Sister Carrie ” can be read as a novel of desire, seduction, or the review of capitalist economy and consumerism. It? s decidedly non the secret plan or characters which are dominant elements of it. The gustatory sensation and the literary value of Dreiser? s novel is shaped and created by its scene and the writer? s tone. Chicago and New York have about as organic and of import function in the novel as the characters.
They do non merely organize the simple environment for the novel, but they influence its character and a really strong feeling. Chicago? s character is sort of more “ positive ” , it is a metropolis of promise, fortune, rise ( Carrie ) . We can state that in Chicago, Hurtswood means something. New York? s character is different. It? s a metropolis of prevarications, autumn, impersonal isolation of “ walled metropolis where surviving is much more hard than in Chicago. In New York, Hurstwood means nil. The puting creates different outlooks to people.
During the reading of “ Sister Carrie ” , I was interested in seeking and uncovering the different sorts of desire. By and large we can state that Dreiser trades with the desire of wealth, societal position, stuff things which are represented by money. Within this generalisation, we can happen and place many other faces and signifiers of lecherousness and yearning. Carrie, as an ambitious and strong adult female embodies the societal values of the consumer civilization.
All she longs for is a material wealth, which represents power. She can be seen as a symbol of money. But Carrie lives in a universe of monetary values. Her labour costs $ 4.50 ; board $ 4 a hebdomad ; auto menu $ .60 ; inexpensive tiffin $ .10 ; etc. She imitates everything absolutely and that? s why she is going what people want her to go.
Her desires come from other people? s desires. It is precisely Drouet, who introduces her to the universe of wealth, to philistinism. He gives her money, level even “ name when she enters the universe of theatre.
She plays her function harmonizing to Drouet? s desires? one time acts as his kept woman or “ married woman ” . She plays a sort of function for him and by copying whatever the “ drummer ” desires in adult females, she becomes simply a contemplation of “ masculine ” desire. It seems to me that she is ne’er allowed to show any desire of her ain? except for her desire for consu mption (admiring and buying clothes). I think in her relationship with other people, she feels bigger pleasure fro being desired than for feeling desire of her own.
The question is wheter Dreiser?s attitude towards women is negative or positive? Are his women just objects or active characters? Or does Dreiser reinforce the conventional belief that the essence of a woman is just a performance of a role? I think we can also talk about a kind of “prostitution” as for the female characters, namely Carrie and Julia. Carrie sells herself for $20, and she is paid far more for her body than she is for her labor. Julia also demands money which makes her marriage also as a form of prostitution.
Is sex in this world, consumption society, a woman?s most marketable product? Do these women have or even can they have their own faces? Hurstwood?s desire is to possess, to possess a quiet and peaceful life with exciting “episodes”. He views marriage as a contract that gives him a right to control both women without questions. He thinks he has the absolute power to make decisions. Does Dreiser want to stress that power is a natural and singular masculine right? Dreiser?s attitude towards his characters is pretty confusing. He tries to manipulate his readers and throughout the novel, he makes comments judgements on the characters and their actions. Definitely, he feels more sympathy towards his male characters. His opinion on women is not “pleasant”, he is putting them to a position of creatures who are naturally imitative, who love performance, clothing, so not ones who could follow their own decisions. The author?s voice makes the tone of the novel which is very important and dominant in Dreiser?s “Sister Carrie”.
This is also a typical trait of naturalism, where the author is taking back his control over the characters and their actions. I think, “Sister Carrie” represents a naturalistic type of novel. The characters and their actions are determined, and they do not have much free will.
Many actions take place by accident, by chance which is not of course “spiritual fate” but still forms different kinds of determinism. Carrie?s fate is determined by her gender, by her environment – cities where she lives – and people, who she is surrounded by. Although Carrie does not leave a very “sweet taste” in the readers? mouth, I like her. I am not saying that her reactions would represent a woman with high moral qualities, but as for the society, it was not her choice. I think, it was the only way to live and survive. I like Dreiser?s images of seasons, weather, theater, newspaper.
I like his comments, observations, and language. It was really a very enjoyable and exciting reading.