Should Workers Be Allowed To Strike Essay

Should Workers Be Allowed To Strike? Essay, Research PaperIt is hard to see how anyone could deny that all workers should hold the rights to strike. This is because striking gives workers freedom of address. This is justifiable, because Britain is a democratic state. My first ground back uping the gesture that workers should be allowed to strike is in order to convey to the bow hapless safety conditions. For case, in the atomic power industry, any breaches of safety can hold tragic effects.

If the employees are exposed to atomic stuff, this could take to serious unwellnesss such as malignant neoplastic disease, leukemia and radiation illness. Radioactive stuff could besides impact occupants of the environing country, as in the instance of the Chernobyl catastrophe. In the visible radiation of hapless safety conditions, workers striking can be justified by the fact that the authorities and populace would be informed. Similarly, another justification for employees striking is that production and assurance would possibly increase after industrial action. This could be because, when workers strike for higher wage or better conditions and their employers run into their demands, the employees return to their topographic point of work with higher morale than before the walk-out.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

As a effect, the higher productiveness would be good to the proprietors. Likewise, industrial action gives the worker a line of protest against unjust hours or mean rewards. Theoretically, if taking industrial action was outlawed, the direction could enforce any footings and contract alterations that they wished on their forces. On the contrary, in world the lone effectual option that skilled laborers have when their house underpay them is down tools and walk out. This would ensure that the proprietors would have to negotiate with the unions, as skilled workers are difficult to locate. Furthermore, if the workers belonging to one trade union walk out, the situation may be intensified by the fact that one trade union’s leaders can call on an allied union’s members to down tools.

To this end, there are many ties – official and unspoken – between the trade unions. For instance, in 1926 when the Miner’s Federation received official notice of wage cuts for miners, the TUC (Trade Unions Congress) called on railway labourers, bus drivers and many others to strike in support of the miners. On the fourth of May, two million labourers walked out to strengthen the cause of the pit workers. Twelve days later, the strike was called off, and the miners kept going unswerving until Christmas. The strike itself was a failure, but for those twelve days in May, it showed how powerful the humble worker was; the whole country ground to a halt. On the contrary, some people would argue that industrial action causes disruption to the general public because of the amenities that are interrupted, for instance bus and train services. Although this is true, the disorganisation would turn the media spotlight on the employers, forcing them to give in to public pressure and accede to their employee’s demands.

As has been noted, strikes are sometimes necessary for the public and worker’s safety. It is also often their only way of democratic protest against poor conditions and pay. It would be difficult to deny that walking out is morally incorrect. However, despite the ethics of the debate, industrial action is here to stay.


I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out