Should Scholarship Athletes Work Essay Research Paper
Should Scholarship Athletes Work Essay, Research PaperSHOULD SCHOLARSHIP ATHLETES WORK?Should college jocks on full drive scholarships be able to keep a occupation during the school twelvemonth? Well up until Monday, January 12, 1997, full scholarship jocks were forbidden to keep occupations during the school twelvemonth. For the last five old ages this has been a really controversial issue in the National Collegiate Athletic Association, known as the NCAA. Imagine being from a hapless household and traveling to college on a full-ride scholarship for hoops.
Under the old statute law, that participant is non allowed to work or have money from the school. In bend the participant can non afford to even go place over the vacations to be with his household. Athletes should be able to keep a occupation during the school twelvemonth in order to acquire the valuable experience of working and do adequate money to cover life disbursals and going costs.
Under the new statute law, which was passed at the NCAA Convention, Division I athletes on full scholarship will be allowed to gain adequate money to fit the full cost of go toing school. Athletic scholarships typically cover room, board, books and tuition, but do non cover costs for trips place, gas, wash and other points. The finding of how much money covers those things is made by each school & # 8217 ; s fiscal assistance office ; most decision makers have estimated the costs to be between $ 2,000 and $ 3,000 a twelvemonth. Athletes who choose to work, and their employers, will be required to subscribe an affidavit that says the jocks have non been hired on the footing of their athletic ability or position and thaT they will be compensated merely for the work they perform at a rate commensurate with the local rate of wage for such work.Critics of the statute law that passed said it opens the door for the really jobs that originally sparked the ordinance, athletes being paid for humble labour, and that maintaining path of how much money jocks are gaining will be hard. But harmonizing to Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany, & # 8220 ; Sure there will be fake occupations, & # 8221 ; he said. & # 8220 ; It & # 8217 ; ll open up a can of worms, but I think we have to get down populating with tins of worms and allow the presidents, athletic managers, and board of legal guardians handle it. & # 8221 ; It makes more sense to hold the schools required to implement the new ordinances involved than it does to inquire the NCAA to manage it.
The schools have first manus history O f all the participants at their school, therefore they are in the best place to implement the new statute law? s demands.On the occupation experience is indispensable when looking for a occupation after college. Many jocks under the old statute law did non hold the imperative experience necsasary.
Bridget Niland is a former distance smuggler at the State University of New York and president of the NCAA Student-Athlete Advisory Committee. She gives a good illustration of why the existent work experience is necessary to going successful. She said, & # 8220 ; Athletic experience, while valuable, can non be equated with existent work experience. .
. . When you apply for a occupation, an employer says, `It & # 8217 ; s great you can run a 4:30 stat mi, but what work experience do you hold? & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; Now full scholarship jocks will be able to acquire at least some existent work experience.