Self And Identity Essay Research Paper Essay
Self And Identity Essay, Research Paper
Essay Option # 5
Self and Identity
The better which a individual develops an apprehension of themselves and of the other people around them, the better able they will be able to develop intimate relationships. A individual who has a negative theoretical account of ego and has a negative theoretical account of others, otherwise known as Fearful, is traveling to shy away from fond regard and be socially avoidant which evidently is traveling to impact the crisis of familiarity versus isolation. The illustration describes a individual who is hesitating to do long term committednesss and resists impulses to expose familiarity, but is capable of organizing a dependence on him by the other in the relationship. A Preoccupied individual has a negative ego theoretical account and a positive theoretical account of others. They frequently tend to be overly dependent and ambivalent. The illustration suggests a individual who might be diffident and conservative but is capable of non exposing their awkward feelings to the other individual. A Secure person has a positive theoretical account of ego and others. They are comfy with familiarity and liberty and frequently do non hold a hard clip in organizing intimate relationships. The illustration describes this individual as person who is really capable of healthy relationships and good communicating accomplishments. It seems like a secure individual has all the good qualities that any relationship requires. And eventually, a Dismissing individual has a positive theoretical account of ego but a negative theoretical account of others. They are characterized by denying fond regard and their counter dependence. All of the differences among the different theoretical accounts result from past experiences in the person s life. How they were raised in footings of different parenting manners and methods of kid raising affect an persons internal working theoretical accounts of ego and others.
Attachment manners of Secure persons are described as passionate and selfless. They have high degrees of familiarity, passion and are really committed and able to be trusted. This reminds me of the perfect girlfriend. I don & # 8217 ; t see a batch of jealously and eccentric caput games coming from a unafraid individual. They are extremely self confident and low on ego consciousness with their spouse. They tend non to fear being close to another individual and yet are non likely to travel out of their head when things don & # 8217 ; t experience right. Avoidant people are known for their caput games. They tend to be low in footings of familiarity, passion and committedness. This reminds me of a relationship my roomate has with his girlfriend. They are both frantically in love with each other and yet all they do is fight over stupid small game they play Wisconsins
th each other. Neither one of them are faithful to the other and they seldom speak encouragingly of their relationship. They are both really self witting and yet still interdependent on each other for support. An Ambivalent individual tends to be really genitive of other persons in a relationship with them. They tend non to be really passionate and trusty in footings of committedness. As its described in the worksheet that they are high on pre business, dependance, and idealisation. They are known to be self witting and yet still willing to originate intimate relationships.
Differences in internal on the job theoretical accounts of ego and others every bit good as differences in attachment manners can be accredited to assorted influences. For illustration secure persons have memories of their parents being warm and fond while Ambivalent people tend to retrieve their male parent being unjust. Differences in attachment beliefs and attitudes such as the sum of ego uncertainties and self deserving one has and 1s ability to understand others are obvious from secure to ambivalent. Secure people tend to experience that others are trusty and reliable piece avoidant folks think that societal state of affairss are hard to understand. And eventually while avoidant people need to keep distance in relationships, secure and ambivalent people desire intimate relationships but vary in grade of familiarity. These differences stem from the persons perceptual experience of others and where he/she fits into world. People act how they think they are suppose to, so their perceptual experience of world is a major factor in finding how they act in, and while set uping intimate relationships.
Identity accomplishment comes from many old ages of researching different functions and personalities. Like we discussed in category persons can alter their attitudes and personalities about daily. As the individual is seeking new things he/she is besides taking cues form society as to which function or personality they fit best. How and single perceives these cues will find how they choose which personality or function is right for them. As we move from secure people to ambivalent we can see variable degrees of ego consciousness and ego worth. These two features are primary in organizing familiarity. A individuals internal on the job theoretical accounts are straight impacting that individuals ability to comprehend world which is basically the battle for individuality. So as the features of ego and others every bit good as fond regard manners, are nearing security, strength, worth, and importance the better able that individual is at making, maintaining, and basking themselves