Room With A View Essay Research Paper
Room With A View Essay, Research PaperA Room With A PositionThe actions of people speak for their character. Some attack life through the senses and some attack it through spirit. Others adhere to convention and some do non. Yet, any manner one approaches life, every action one makes indicates specifying features about who the individual is as an person. In A Room With A View Mr. Eager and Mr.
Emerson are rather opposite in the manner they approach state of affairss. Therefore, they demonstrate their character by the things they do and the words they say throughout the novel. When Mr.
Eager attempts to divide the? brother and sister? on the passenger car, Mr. Emerson says the followers: ? ? Leave them entirely, ? Mr. Emerson begged the chaplain, of whom he stood in no awe. ? Do we happen felicity so frequently that we should turn it off the box when it happens to sit at that place? To be driven by lovers? A male monarch might envy us, and if we portion them it? s more like profanation than anything I know. ? ? ( Chapter 6 ) He does non desire love to be interrupted under any fortunes. Mr.
Emerson does non understand why anyone would desire to take away felicity, when there is so small to travel about. He even uses the term? profanation? because Mr. Eager is a priest and maybe that would be easier for him to understand. Mr.
Emerson? s position of life is: he sees things as being about felicity and love. Harmonizing to the criterions of his clip, he is winging in the face of convention. When the two lovers are separated Mr. Eager proclaims, ? Victory at last! ? But Mr. Emerson rapidly retorts, ? It is non victory. It is defeat. You have parted two people who were happy.
? ( Chapter 6 ) Harmonizing to the manner that Mr. Eager views life, two lovers embracing, touching and caressing is coarse. But, Mr. Emerson thinks that it is fantastic and that there should be more loving in life. Nevertheless, Mr. Eager thinks that it is non proper behavior because he is a priest and in his universe, it is non appropriate to demo aff ection in public. Conversely, Mr. Emerson regards the behavior in the carriage as a beautiful and natural part of life.
In general, Mr. Eager looks down on mankind. He thinks that on the average, man is ignorant and unconscious. ?If you will not think me rude, we residents sometimes pity you poor tourists not a little?living herded together in pensions or hotels, quite unconscious of anything that is outside Baedeker, their one anxiety to get ?done? or ?through? and go on somewhere else.?(Chapter 6) This is a very negative stereotype of tourists. He thinks that all tourists are uninformed and preoccupied. Mr. Eager?s view is very odd because he is a priest and he is supposed to embrace all of mankind.
Italy is a large country and it contains many historic sites. Tourists will often be fascinated and move quickly in order to see the entire country: another example of how oblivious Mr. Eager?s view of life is. Mr. Emerson is ?sleeping? through all of Mr. Eager?s ramblings and generalizations. He does not even dignify him with an argument on the matter because Mr.
Emerson knows that all people, including tourists, do not fit Mr. Eager?s description. He knows that people, by nature, are curious and can be energetic, which, according to Mr.
Emerson, is a natural facet of human life. He believes that people should have a passion for life. Even though the times have changed, there are still distinct differences between liberals and conservatives.
No matter what people say about how times have changed, there are still opposing forces. The world contains many different cultures and religions, each with different views of ?acceptable? behavior. Today, it would be rare that someone would stop a carriage because two people where embracing in the front. This is because today?s society has changed so much. But, one can understand both where Mr. Eager and Mr.
Emerson are coming from. As the world becomes smaller, educated societies are becoming more tolerant of opposing ideas an