Romeo And Juliet Various Types Of Love Essay
Romeo And Juliet: Assorted Types Of Love Essay, Research Paper
Throughout the calamity of Romeo and Juliet assorted types of & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; are
displayed. Benvolio believes adult females are interchangeable, while, at the
get downing Romeo Bel ieves love is hurting. At the get downing Juliet does non
even have a definition of love. Paris & # 8217 ; s and Lady Capulet & # 8217 ; s definition of
love is in visual aspect. It is obvio us that Shakespeare wants the audience
to believe that the lone & # 8220 ; true & # 8221 ; or & # 8220 ; existent & # 8221 ; love is the love that exists
between Romeo and Juliet. The first type of love the audience is introduced
to is the & # 8220 ; interchangeable & # 8221 ; lo ve of Benvolio. Harmonizing to Benvolio, a adult male
should & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; a adult female for merely the continuance of their relationship. If their
relationship should stop, the adult male should experience no heartache. If the adult female culls
the adult male ab initio, he should still experience no heartache. In either state of affairs, the
adult male should merely get down a relationship with anot her adult female. Benvolio & # 8217 ; s
definition of love shows the audience two things about Ben volio: he is a
womaniser and he has ne’er earlier experient & # 8220 ; true love. & # 8221 ; The following
definition of love comes from Romeo, but before the clip he met Juliet.
Harmonizing to his definition, love ( or, instead, non returned love ) is pain.
He h ides from the Sun due to the & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; he feels, and does non move like
& # 8220 ; himself. & # 8221 ; I believe Romeo is both right and incorrect: non returned love is
hurting, but Romeo doe s non genuinely love, as he is simply infatuated by a
adult female. The following definition of love comes from Juliet, who, before meeting
Romeo, did no T even have a definition of love. She appears non to cognize
what love is, and, for that affair, does non look to care. She remains
ignorant until she meets Romeo.
Another type of & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; we are exposed to during the same scene is the love of Lady
Capulet. Lady Capulet believes love comes from visual aspect, both physical and
political, and has nil to make with emotion. She shows this when she speaks
favourably of Paris & # 8217 ; s looks and his aristocracy. She besides shows that she does non love
Capulet when she publically denounces him. The Nurse & # 8217 ; s sentiment of love coincides
with that of Lady Capulet.
Paris has a similar position of love. His & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; for Juliet appears to be pure, but
his ground does non. He loves Juliet for her visual aspect and nil else. He
respects her more as belongings than as an person. He is besides selfish in his & # 8220 ; love. & # 8221 ;
When he believes Juliet is dead ( in Act IV ) he seems sorrier for his ain loss
than Juliet & # 8217 ; s evident loss. He & # 8220 ; loves & # 8221 ; Juliet every bit much as he can love anyone, but
his love can non be considered & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ; because of his selfishness.
Finally, in Act II, the audience sees what is defined as & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ; in our society.
This & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; is the love that grows between Romeo and Juliet. The definition
of & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ; Shakespeare provides the audience with provinces that all the other
characters & # 8217 ; definitions of love are incorrect. It besides states that when two people
are in true love, there is no hurting unless they are for good separated. It
shows that lovers are non interchangeable, and that love transcends visual aspect.
It proves all except one other & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; in the drama incorrect. It besides shows that existent
love is non affected by distance or convenience. When two people are in & # 8220 ; true love & # 8221 ;
they are non selfish to one another, do non care about visual aspects, and can non
live without one another. I agree with this definition of love ( all except that
without one another the lovers can non last ) .
Romeo and Juliet & # 8217 ; s love for one another besides goes beyond one other thing: names.
It shows that names do non count. In our society the difference in names would
be equal to two people of different races. The people would come from racialist
households in a modern twenty-four hours remaking of the drama.
The last illustration of love in the drama is parental love. This is shown in Act V
scene three. Lady Montague dies due to separation from her boy. Capulet, Montague,
Lady Capulet, and even the Nurse shows that they love either Romeo or Juliet in T
In the calamity of Romeo and Juliet many types of love are shown. None of them
are incorrect, as the word & # 8220 ; love & # 8221 ; is capable to reading, but it is obvious that
Shakspere did non hold this in head when he wrote the drama. Shakspere shows
us that the lone type of love worth being in is & # 8220 ; true love. & # 8221 ; He besides shows us
that, with all types of love, there is hurting. If his end was to act upon the
audience to believe that the lone existent love is the type of love that existed
between Romeo and Juliet, I believe he accomplished it.
Shakespear, Romeo & A ; Juliet