Receptors In Intestinal Muscle Biology Essay

The experiment was conducted in order to derive better apprehension of the map of the receptors in the guinea hog ileum.

For this ground, assorted agonists and adversaries were used and the musculus reaction was monitored. The consequences of our experiment are summarized in the undermentioned tabular array.As we can see acetylcholine and hexamethonium both have a triethylamine at one terminal and a consecutive concatenation of Cs. The basic difference is that hexamethonium has two third aminoalkanes, one on each terminal of the concatenation, whereas acetylcholine has the group -O-C ( =O ) -CH3 on one terminal.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Harmonizing to the SAR theory ( Structure Activity Relationship ) similar molecules in construction tend to hold similar biological activity. As we know, both acetylcholine and hexamethonium bind to the nicotinic receptor, the first one to trip a response and the 2nd one to forestall acetylcholine from adhering. Hexamethonium, holding two active groups, can likely adhere more easy to the receptor, efficaciously barricading the acetylcholine action.B )Histamine and mepyramine have less similarities in construction.

Both of them have three N and an aromatic ring. Histamine has the two N inside the aromatic ring whereas mepyramine has merely one N edge in the ring. Both compounds bind to the H1-Histamine receptor, to trip different reactions. The difference in construction can be explained by the different action of the two compounds. Histamine causes contraction of the musculus and mepyramine causes its relaxation.

The drugs tested were classified as agonists and adversaries.Acetylcholine: Acts as neurotransmitter. It binds on the muscarinic and nicotinic receptors and causes musculus contraction.Histamine: Is besides a neurotransmitter.

It binds on the H1-Histamine receptor and causes smooth musculus contraction.Nicotine: It acts on the nicotinic cholinergic receptors and mimics the nervous transmittal. It stimulates the musculus, so blocks stimulation.Isoprenaline: Although isoprenaline was seemingly an adversary, it is really a selective agonist for the I?- sympathomimetic receptors that causes musculus relaxation.

It is a adrenergic drug that mimics the consequence of exciting the postganglionic sympathomimetic sympathetic nervousnesss.Hexamethonium: It is a nicotinic adversary and a ganglionic blocker. It binds to the nicotinic cholinergic receptors and blocks the actions of acetylcholine or cholinergic agonists. It has no effects on muscarinic ( Mach ) receptors.Mepyramine: It is a histamine H1 adversary and targets the H1- Receptor.

Although it was believed to be an adversary simply to barricade the actions of endogenous histamine without triping the receptors, it has late been classified as an reverse agonist diminishing the self-generated activity of gp-H1r. It besides inhibits histamine induced inositol phosphate ( InsP ) production and intracellular Ca mobilisation. It causes a pronounced lessening in the maximum response to histamine at high concentrations.Atropine: It is a competitory adversary for the muscarinic cholinergic receptor ( Mach ) . It binds to the receptor without triping it, therefore barricading the actions of endogenous acetylcholine or exogenic agonists.a ) The drug in this experiment were moving on three receptors.

H1-Histamine receptors, muscarinic ( Mach ) receptors and nicotinic ( nAch ) receptors. Each agonist was moving on a different receptor and that is evident from our consequences. When utilizing an adversary that blocked a specific receptor it merely inhibited the action of the drug moving on that peculiar receptor, and had no consequence on the remainder of the drugs.

B ) The receptors were evidently located on the surface of the musculus, so that the entree of the drugs would be possible.The first evident adversary which turned out to be an agonist was isoprenaline. It acts on the I?- sympathomimetic receptors doing musculus relaxation and antagonized all the three agonists who acted on different receptors. This type of hostility is called a physiological adversary and describes the interaction of two drugs who cause opposing actions in the organic structure and tend to call off each other. In this instance, the isoprenaline Acts of the Apostless on the I?- sympathomimetic receptors and causes relaxation of the musculus, whereas the agonist act on the histaminic, nicotinic and muscarinic receptors and do contraction of the musculus.

The 2nd evident adversary was mepyramine, which acts on the histamine receptor and blocks the action of histamine. It has late been classified as an reverse agonist, doing musculus relaxation. This type of agonists show selectivity to the resting province of the receptor.Atropine acts on the muscarinic receptors and blocks their action. Thus it prevents acetylcholine from adhering to the receptor and exciting it.

Nicotine though activates the nicotinic receptor that seemingly has nil to make with atropine. The reversal of nicotine action indicates the presence of inhibitory postganglionic ( terminal ) neurones, which respond to stimulation of their ganglion-cells by bring oning relaxation of the intestine. It is besides suggested by other experiments [ Phillis & A ; York, 1968 ] that an intermediate type of receptor is involved. Assuming specificity of the adversary these surveies are explained by a non-classical cholinergic receptor with assorted pharmacological belongingss. Such receptors are the newest members of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ( nAChR ) household, encoded by the I±9/I±10 fractional monetary units, that possess a combined nicotinic-muscarinic sensitiveness.Barium Chloride is a H2O soluble salt. Once in contact with the musculus it induces release of intracellular shops of Ca, and causes the contraction of the musculus. If barium chloride comes in contact with Na sulfate it loses its authority.

That is explained by the chemical reaction between the two compounds.Molecular equation:BaCl2 ( aq ) + Na2SO4 ( aq ) — & gt ; BaSO4 ( s ) + 2NaCl ( aq )ionic equation:Ba+2 ( aq ) + 2Cl- ( aq ) + 2Na+ ( aq ) + SO4-2 ( aq ) — & gt ; BaSO4 ( s ) + 2Na+ ( aq ) +2Cl- ( aq )These reactions show that one time in contact with Na sulfate, the Ba chloride dissolves into BaSO4 which is an indissoluble substance and NaCl. Therefore, it can no longer move on the musculus. That type of hostility is called Chemical Antagonism and it refers to the state of affairs when two substances combine in solution ; as a consequence, the consequence of the active drug ( in this instance the Ba chloride ) is lost.The drugs were tested on guinea hog ileum which is a smooth musculus.


I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out