Pablo Picasso The Tragedy Art Essay

The Calamity by Pablo Picasso was painted in 1903 in Barcelona, Spain ( ) . The piece was constructed by oil on wood. It stands at 41 7/16 ten 27 3/16 inches ( ) . The clip at which The Calamity was created is known as Picasso ‘s “blue period.” At this clip he was covering with the recent self-destruction of his close friend Carlos Casagemas ( Artist Pablo Picasso ) . “The bluish period” was defined by gloomy and depressive capable affair, and an overexploitation of bluish colourss. Both of these features are apparent in The Tragedy.

The scene in the picture is that of a in-between aged adult male, a adult female, and a immature male child standing on a shoreline. The scene is dark blue and gloomy which helps to make an overpowering feeling of sadness evident in the picture. The three of them are place at an angle from the spectator and the adult female stands with her dorsum to the spectator. Their organic structure linguistic communication tells us of emphasis and depression. Picasso provided small item to the sky or ocean, both of which are bluish. The dark sand besides lacks item and has been mixed with sunglassess of blue. The organic structures and apparels of the people are the merely elaborate parts of the work. This was done to do certain that the spectator knows the importance of the piece is human emotion. The three of them are without places, and their apparels are dark in colour proposing that they are wet.

Picasso largely used line and colour to finish the ocular elements of The Tragedy. The colourss of the bluish period reflected the depression of his ain life into his art. This is particularly true in this work. The lines in this piece are largely perpendicular. Most are a portion of the make-up of the people. Two strong perpendicular lines outline the adult female and one strong perpendicular line holds up the right side of the adult male. Other perpendicular lines make up the balance of the adult male and besides the male child. These types of lines are besides really emphasized in the make-up of their apparels. One strong horizontal line separates the H2O from the sky. The strong horizontal line helps to equilibrate the picture which is largely dominated by perpendicular lines.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The work is largely still with little gesture apparent where the H2O meets the shore. Picasso used several white, fluxing lines to stand for this gesture. Otherwise the ocean and the sky are unagitated and still. The picture is non rather symmetrical. The adult female stands to one side of the scene, and the male child and adult male to the other. Though this would look to put the piece off balance, Picasso did a great occupation of maintaining the work really good balanced through the usage of colour and line. The graduated table of the people in comparing to the H2O and sky is non good proportioned. The people about seem excessively large for the scene. Though this is so, I believe it is an consequence used to once more demo the focal point of worlds and their emotion to this work.

The deep blue ‘s of this art is what caught my oculus. When I saw this piece I knew I needed to cognize the narrative. After some research on the piece I feel as though the narrative Picasso is stating us is still unknown. Possibly he wanted the single spectator to construe the narrative in their ain manner. One reappraisal on the work ( The Artist Pablo Picasso ) suggested that the adult male, adult female, and male childs are a household. This reappraisal suggests that the household is non stranded on the beach as many would presume at first expression, but instead that they are a stateless household who live on or near this beach. The referee says that the manner the household stands suggests this possibility. He argues that the household seems familiar with the country and stands distant as if in deep idea instead than looking as though they are overwrought and confused as they would if they were lost. A 2nd reappraisal of the work written by Jon Corey suggests that guilt is a chief subject in the work. He says that multiple features of the adult male ‘s position suggest that he is the guilty party. These features include a dropped caput and one pes a measure back from the other. He says that the organic structure linguistic communication of the adult female implies that she is “the 1 who reprimands the man.” Corey besides suggests that the three topics are non a household. This is illustrated through the distance between the three of them. We assume that if they were a household there would be a stronger feeling of connection between the three of them. Although I agree more with the latter analysis of the work, Corey does non state us his position of where the three of them came from. In my personal sentiment I think that the three of them did come from the sea, but like Corey I do non believe they are a household. They all look cold and moisture as if they had merely washed ashore. I feel that that they are the lone three subsisters of a ship that capsized. Possibly guilt is a subject of the piece in that they feel guilty of being the lone subsisters.

Blue is my favourite colour, and though it represents sadness particularly in this peculiar work, I am still really drawn to it. I think that the mysteriousness of the work besides draws me in. I am non typically a fan of Picasso, but I like this piece. It is something that I would hold in my ain place if given the opportunity. I am still interested to cognize if there was an intended narrative behind the work or if it was merely meant for me to state my ain.


Artist Pablo Picasso, The. ( 2010 ) . Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // picasso-painting-tragedy.htm ( 2010, April 21 ) .

Corey, Jon. ( 2007, November 13 ) . Art History. Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: // ( 2010, April 21 ) .

National Gallery of Art. ( 2010 ) . Pablo Picasso ‘s The Calamity: Metamorphosis of a Painting. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: // ( 2010, April 20 ) .

Claude Monet: The Nipponese Footbridge1899

Claude Monet was a Gallic creative person who lived from 1840 until 1926. This picture titled The Nipponese Footbridge was completed in 1899. The piece is a scene from his ain H2O garden at Giverny ( ) . The scene was recreated by him over 250 times during the ulterior half of his life. He became so haunted with painting this peculiar scene that finally became the lone subject of his plants ( ) . There are multiple other plants by Monet with same or similar rubrics and content. This piece is 32 ten 40in and was created by oil on canvas ( ) .

Monet was a major portion of the Impressionism motion. The term “impressionism” was really an abuse made toward a work by Monet ( Frank 366 ) . The term stuck and the motion grew. The focal point of these creative persons was landscapes, seasons, and clip of twenty-four hours. The impressionist wanted to portray “what the oculus really sees instead than what the head knows” ( Frank 365 ) . From this motion The Nipponese Footbridge was created.

The picture depicts a watercourse environment by really tall and thick grass. The watercourse is covered in light pink lily tablets. The H2O is non clear, but instead emphasizes the contemplation of the grass environing it. As an impressionist piece the colourss are non separated, but alternatively meshed together doing a less graphic image of the scene. Get downing the underside of the work you see the scene as if from about oculus degree with the H2O. At the top of the canvas a blue-grey span crosses the watercourse taking to either side of the grassy Bankss. There are trees in the background giving us a sense that the watercourse winds out of position. Like most of Monet ‘s work and that of other impressionist there is really small to the scene. The span, H2O, grass, lily tablets, and background of trees complete the scene giving us no position of the sky or what lies to either side of the watercourse.

The ocular elements of the work give the spectator a feeling of peace when sing the picture. The lines are soft and curved. The curve of the span is the most outstanding line in the work. The soft yet bold line of the span combined with its blueish-gray colour sets the temper for the spectator. Although it is a peaceable scene, the balance of the colour strategy sets the temper to neither happy nor sad. The dark leafy vegetables and blues contrast the light pinks and white. The scene is really still which besides helps the spectator to experience at peace. There is no recognizable impression to motion of the H2O taking us to believe it is either a still watercourse or a really slow traveling one. This deficiency of impression makes me experience as though clip is standing still in the picture. The centre of the work is light in contrast to heavy. The weightiness or mass in the piece is focused in the background and to the sides. This mass is concentrated in the thick wood of braid in the background and the overgrown grass to the sides. The focal point of visible radiation ( colour ) is on the span. In a few musca volitanss on what we see as the forepart of the span the colour is really light blue. It about does non fit the remainder of the span. Monet used this to give the semblance that the Sun is reflecting off the span. Knowing that clip of twenty-four hours was of import to his work, I must reason that this is a scene at either sundown or dawn.

The picture is about absolutely symmetrical. The watercourse runs straight through the centre of the work spliting the two grassy Bankss into two little equal proportions. The manner the H2O winds swimmingly around the lily tablets leads the oculus to the trees of the background. In this background there is a dark topographic point in the trees that falls in the centre of the work. This topographic point helps to split the work to be even more symmetrical. The span railings were positioned merely plenty off centre to forestall the work from being absolutely symmetrical, but the work is still really good balanced. A contemplation of the span falls in the underside of the picture widening the balance from non merely left to compensate but besides top to bottom. With the contemplation of the span Monet makes it clear to us that this is a wooden span by uncovering the underside of the span in the contemplation. In the contemplation we see brown that we do non see if the existent span.

I have found from this category that I enjoy impressionism more than any other types of art. I can non state that this is my favourite piece by Monet since I favor the work Impression: Dawn as one of my favourite plants of art in general, but I do like The Nipponese Footbridge. I like the repose of the scene and I love the span. I think the things I do non wish about the picture are the position and the colourss. I feel a small trapped in the little scene Monet provides for us and I want to be able to see what lies exterior of what he is leting us to see. I besides find the colourss a small dull. Like all creative persons I am certainly he had a intent in taking his colourss, but something a small brighter would hold made the piece better for me. Even the usage of more visible radiation could hold brightened it up merely plenty to take away that impersonal feeling of neither happiness nor sadness. Over all I think it is a good picture. He used the ocular component and the rules of design in a manner to do the piece easy on the oculus and gratifying to look at.

Plants Cited

Frank, P. ( 2009 ) . Prebles ‘ Artforms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

National Gallery of Art. ( 2010 ) . The Collection. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // ( 2010, April 19 ) .

The ShipwreckBy Claude Joseph Vernet

Claude Joseph Vernet was a Gallic painter in the 18th century. He was the most celebrated H2O and landscape creative person of his clip ( ) . He was good known for portraying conditions and clip of twenty-four hours in his work ( ) . Most of his pieces included scenes of either rain, lightning, clouds, moonshine, sundown, storms or a combination of these topics ( ) . He “Specialized in [ these ] stormy seascapes, frequently picturing sailing vass in distress” ( ) .

Vernet ‘s painting The Shipwreck is an illustration of one of these specialised seascapes. The piece is 44 ?64inches and was created with the usage of oil on canvas. The scene in The Shipwreck is that of a ship being washed under by monolithic moving ridges. The ship has approached the beach, and the few staying on board are merely seconds from either safety or catastrophe. Most riders have made it to the safety of the beach and are madly watch as the ship is overcome with H2O. The air current is so powerful that the canvas of the ship is being pulled inland and is running about analogue to the beach. Those who have escaped the droping ship have done so by mounting down the ropes of the canvas and dropped safely off the rope and onto the beach. The subsisters stand keeping ropes of the canvas in what looks to be an effort to stabilise the ship merely long plenty for the staying riders to get away via this path. Two people hang from the ropes of safety as though debating when to allow travel and do the autumn to land. A individual on the beach stands beneath them with their weaponries raised as to state “Jump and I will catch you.” Four people have made it to the top of the canvas and are nearing the safety of the ropes. Another individual climbs the canvas in an attempt to make the top and do his manner down the rope. One last individual can be seen on the deck of the ship. His dorsum is to us as he leans over the side of the ship that is yet to travel under. He leans difficult. It makes the viewer ask if the adult male is on his manner overboard or if he is his last efforts to make out for person who has already gone overboard.

To the right a individual is stranded on a bowlder that lines the beach. To the left another bolder strands two more people. Behind these two people a immense moving ridge clangs against the tall stone shore line. In the forepart left manus corner a group of people have made it off from the crashing shore and to a safer topographic point. Three of them attend to a wilted adult female who seems to be injured or even unconscious. Another adult male in this country rolls a barrel up the beach to a safer topographic point.

In the back land another ship can be seen. It besides looks as though it excessively will shortly be taken by the storm. Atop the tall bouldery shoreline a palace can be seen in the distance. Vernet used buoy uping from the storm to make visible radiation in this piece. A immense diagonal run of buoy uping bents in the sky merely above the 2nd ship. The sky is lit in pink around the lightening while the remainder of the sky is covered in dark, stormy greies and blues. The lightening run has a crisp line that shows its strength and assertiveness in the sky. This line points straight to a metropolis in the background of the picture. The metropolis is lit by the lightening in a warm pink. The heat of the metropolis symbolized a safe topographic point. It says to the spectator ; If merely the ship would hold washed ashore here, everything would be okay.

Vernet used other crisp, self-asserting lines every bit good. The mast of the ship which hangs over the beach holds a crisp line that points toward the upper left manus side of the picture. The oculus follows this line upward and to a broken tree subdivision that hangs in the stones of the shore. Vernet used colour to demo us that this tree has late been broken in the thick of the storm. The staying tree limbs blow hard to the left bespeaking the direct of the overmastering air current. From there the oculus is caught by the white of a interrupting moving ridge against a dark background. This is when the two people stranded on the bowlder are noticed. From the bowlder the oculus is taken by horizontal lines of the moving ridges of the sea and carried over to the sinking ship. This is when the viewer takes more item to adorn of the ship. From here the spectator is besides made aware of a adult male stranded on a 2nd bowlder.

Line and colour are the strongest ocular elements in this piece. Though line plays a great function in the flow of the work, I feel that Vernet ‘s usage of colour is what made the picture great to me. The dark sky is lit by the lightening in a pinkish orange. This colour is reflected on the metropolis in the background. Above the metropolis the sky is violet. The violet blends into a dark blue and greies which so become lighter blue in musca volitanss above the ship. These lighter bluish musca volitanss were used to portray the Sun that is hidden behind the dark, stormy clouds. The portraiture of the Sun is besides apparent on the beach. In the country that is the focal point of the piece, the Sun radiances down and illume the people. The sand here is lighter, and the ocean is green in this country instead than blue. In the sky above this country a interruption in the clouds reveals the blue sky. This is where the sunshine is coming from. I think the usage of visible radiation here gives the spectator a sense of hope, and the knowing that these people will last. In contrast to these people, the last adult male aboard the deck of the ship is really dark. A little country of light reflects of his dorsum merely plenty to do him noticeable. I feel that this adult male was painted in dark colourss to portray his destiny of non lasting this shipwreck.

The colour and the seascape is what made me pick this picture. I love the blues, leafy vegetables, and purples of the piece, and H2O is my favourite topic when it comes to art. After close attending to the item of this piece I respect it in a different manner. The symbolism of visible radiation and dark in this picture is beautiful. I have ne’er truly thought of art in that sense until now. It has opened my eyes to how absolutely the ocular elements can be manipulated to make something meaningful.


Claude Joseph Vernet: The Shipwreck. ( 2010 ) . Retrieved from the National Gallery of

Art web site: hypertext transfer protocol: //

( 2010, April 24 ) .

Vincent new wave Gogh’sGirl in White

After research on Starry Night by new wave Gogh, I have taken involvement in him. I wanted to research another piece by him so I choose Girl in White. I choose this piece for two grounds. The first ground was because I wanted to analyze something far different from Starry Night. At first glimpse of this piece it is easy to see that the content and colourss used are well different in the two pictures. Second, the clip at which this was painted is interesting to me. I know that he died in July of 1890 after a ego inflicted gun shooting lesion to the tummy ( Life of van Gogh ) . Girl in White is dated 1890 ( ) every bit good, intending this piece by him was created in the thick of his concluding emotional dislocation.

Girl in White was done in the post-impressionist manner which new wave Gogh is known for. It a 26 1/4 ten 18 1/16 inch oil on canvas ( ) . The content is precisely what it sounds like it would be. A miss dressed in a white frock bases in the centre of the picture. She is surrounded by tall flowers and appears to be standing in the center of a field. There is small item to the work. The flowers in the piece barely even resemble flowers. Van Gogh merely used long, thick coppice shots to stand for these flowers. They are somewhat off colour to the remainder of the dorsum land which makes them more noticeable. He besides painted occasional little ruddy circles which represent the buds of the flowers.

The miss is dressed in a white frock. To me this frock looks to be a nuptials frock, but she wears a big Sun chapeau on her caput which means this likely is non a nuptials frock. Although coroneted “Girl, ” this does non look to be a miss, but instead a adult female in her mid to late 20 ‘s. What small facial characteristics van Gogh did supply do to adult female look to be stressed and unhappy. If this were a immature miss I would anticipate a lighter temper expressed on her face.

The lines in the piece are all perpendicular. The adult female appears to be really tall because of the manner these lines were used. The long consecutive lines of her frock, long weaponries, and near abnormally long custodies and fingers make this so. A curving line used in the chapeau which falls across her brow helps to interrupt up all the perpendicular lines. Without this line, the picture would look excessively crisp and less appealing to the oculus. The arrangement of the adult female on the canvas besides gives this perpendicular visual aspect. The really underside of the canvas consists of the lower half of her frock, but her pess are non demoing. The upper portion contains a little sum of the environing field, but the adult female ‘s hat about reaches the top of the canvas. Her organic structure takes up most of the infinite vertically, yet more of the field is evident to the left and right of the adult female. This combined with many perpendicular lines emphasizes her visual aspect of being really tall and thin.

Van Gogh used visible radiation in an interesting manner in this piece. I feel that it is difficult to concentrate on this adult female ‘s face because it appears dark and shaded from light. Alternatively the eyes are more drawn to the lighter countries of the adult female which focal point on her frock around the chest country and lower tummy. I do non cognize if this was meant to be symbolic of birthrate in anyhow, but it seems possible.

The colourss in this piece are field and far different from a batch of his work toward the terminal of his life. Van Gogh painted with dull colourss in his early plants, but had taken a drastic bend in colour strategy in his ulterior pieces. I personally feel like this piece is brooding of the emotional hurting he was digesting at the clip this was created. Since dark colourss a normally associated with decease and death, which I believe van Gogh was debating at the clip this was created, I feel that the light colourss used here stand for his peace he associated with no longer being in his cruel universe. It is known that new wave Gogh used colour to show emotion in his work and this helps me to pull this unusual decision.

When I look at this piece and see the creative person, and the twelvemonth it was created, a narrative comes to my head. I do non cognize if the narrative I create is anyplace near to the truth. I did non research this piece by new wave Gogh specifically, alternatively I wanted to take my ain position of it and analyse it without any outside prejudice. The narrative I see is that of new wave Gogh ‘s lover after his decease. She is dressed in her nuptials frock when she hears the intelligence of his decease. In deep sorrow she wanders aimlessly into a field. There she stands with no way of where to travel, and the confusion and unhappiness is shown on her face. The visible radiation reflected on her chest and tummy could be symbolic of their programs to hold kids or typify that she is already in the early phases of gestation.

Life and Art of Vincent new wave Gogh. ( March 23, 2010 ) . Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //

National Gallery of Art. ( 2010 ) . The Collection. Retrieved from

hypertext transfer protocol: // ( 2010, April 28 ) .

Thomas Moran’sGrand Canyon of Yellowstone

Thomas Moran was born in England in 1837. He moved to the United States as a immature male child, and grew up in Pennsylvania. Though born in England, he is considered an American creative person ( ) . The topic of his art was ever American landscapes. Grand Canyon of Yellowstone was completed in 1872 and is considered a portion of Moran ‘s western aggregation. This picture is said to hold “launched his career” as an creative person ( ) .

Grand Canyon of Yellowstone is a landscape scene from Yellow Stone National Park in Wyoming ( Smithsonian ) . The position is from inside of a canon. The spectator looks out over a shelf and consecutive in front to a H2O autumn in the distance. A mist has built up from the autumn and it clouds the position. From the mist, the oculus catches the bluish H2O of the Yellowstone River ( Smithsonian ) and carries the spectator back to the shelf. Two people stand in the distance at the border of the shelf. It is said that one of these two people is Moran himself ( ) . Besides in the distance what appears to be a Equus caballus and people with baggage are doing their manner up the trail toward to viewer. The spectator is looking west. I think this is of import to the work because it symbolizes Moran ‘s programs of geographic expedition farther West. It is as if he stopped here and took in the position of the way he was headed. I know that the spectator is looking west because more flora is evident on the right side of the canon. More flora indicates a northern way. I know this from personal experience in the western United States.

Moran used visible radiation to demo us how immense the western sky is. He did this by making big dark and light countries throughout the piece. This is important because get downing with the place of the spectator the land goes from dark to visible radiation, back to dark, and once more to visible radiation in the far off distance. The first dark country is non every bit of import as the 2nd because it is likely merely the shadows of the canon. The 2nd dark country nevertheless is representational of a cloud over caput. This is noticeable because of the manner the land is once more lighter in the distance. If you have of all time experienced the immense western sky this is easy to catch on to. I think Moran did the piece this manner because he wanted to include the feeling of the big sky without really demoing it. The position from which the scene is painted does non let much room for the sky so he had to demo its grandness in a different manner.

In the far distance above the canon the land flattens to a tableland. In the even farther distance snowcapped mountains can be recognized. This is besides another indicant that the spectator is looking west and toward the Rocky Mountains.

The graduated table at which Moran painted himself and the other people helps us to hold on the enormousness of canon. They are so little that they are about non even noticed. This gives the spectator an thought of how immense the canon truly is. Moran was painting for those who had ne’er seen anything like this before, and he wanted them to be ale to experience wholly engulfed into the scene as he had felt.

I do non experience that Moran did anything excessively fancy with the piece every bit far as ocular elements are concerned. I think he painted what he saw the manner he saw it, and that is what makes it great. I think this is obvious by his usage of colourss. They consist of dull browns and Earth tones. They are non popular or tricky colourss that would typically pull you into a picture, but they are the true colourss that he saw. Because of this I can appreciate this painting more than any other that I have studied. I know that it is existent. There is no underlying significance or message to be heard. It is merely truth. He wanted you to see the canon as it truly is and appreciate its natural beauty.

Landscape pieces are my favourite topic in art. I am particularly fond of Moran ‘s western aggregation because of my ain personal fond regard at that place. I can associate to his art better than any other creative person I have studied because I know what he felt when he painted these scenes. I know that I felt the same manner the first clip I traveled west. It is an indefinable feeling of beauty and you become wholly engulfed in to it. To me there is nil else like it, and I long to be back at that place about every twenty-four hours! I am so glad I found this piece because it helps to make full in a small piece of me that is losing.

National Gallery of Art. ( 2010 ) . Thomas Moran, The West. Retrieved from:

hypertext transfer protocol: // ( 2010, April 28 ) .

Smithsonian American Art Museum. ( 2010 ) . Retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //

( 2010, April 28 )


I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out