Noise Pollution In Residential Areas Biology Essay

Twenty six sites power looms industries were selected in the nine sectors of Mohalla Gorakhnath in Gorakhpur metropolis.

Out of 20 six industries selected, one industry is holding two power looms, six Numberss of industries are holding 2 to 4 power looms, 10 Numberss of industries are holding 4 to 8 power looms and 12 Numberss of industries are holding more than 8 power looms. These little graduated table power loom based industries are located in the bosom of residential settlements of Gorakhnath country of the Gorakhpur metropolis. Photographs of some of power loom based fabric industries are given in Appendix-A. Peoples in these countries are enduring from the noise pollution generated by the operation of power looms.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

So, it was decided to mensurate the noise produced by power loom industries in these countries with an purpose to propose suited steps for their control.For understanding the noise consequence, noise degrees ( dubnium ) were recorded at three clip slots viz. 9:00 AM, 12:00 PM and 9:00 PM. 24-hour information was besides recorded at few sites for understanding the noise form for full twenty-four hours. The extension of noise to outside from the industry was besides studied. The measured informations for different power looms are given in Appendix-B.

Coevals and extension of noise depend on many factors like quality and type of machine, its foundation, enclosure and barrier around it. It besides depends on texture or surface coating of wall and ceiling. All these factors have been taken into consideration while roll uping informations and its analysis.The conditions information was besides collected from the Indian Meteorological Department, Gorakhpur.

The mean monthly conditions conditions are given in Table-3.1 for mention.

Table: 3.1 Summary of Weather Condition

Calendar month

Average Rain

Average Temp.

( A°C )

Average Relative Humidity

24 hour

Seasonal

Max.

Min.

Max.

Min.

June ( 2008 )15.82132.1932.

9324.7584.4065.

66July ( 2008 )23.56878.0531.4124.9287.5871.74August ( 2008 )14.691433.

7432.7025.2186.5865.12September ( 2008 )7.861755.1433.

2924.2286.1058.27October ( 2008 )0.8120.4032.0320.3886.

9048.61November ( 2008 )025.2029.

1714.0585.2638.60December ( 2008 )025.2022.5911.

7185.9057.61January ( 2009 )00.4321.

749.3686.1653.96February ( 2009 )00.6027.0811.6273.3529.

89March ( 2009 )0.030.07132.3215.5468.2521.38April ( 2009 )01.

1038.4221.3151.5015.00May ( 2009 )5.8239.5136.5123.

8771.4235.64June ( 2009 )1.6526.4337.

5625.6776.8037.03

3.2 Variation of Noise Pollution ( Level ) with Time

The noise degree informations collected from all 26 power looms based industries ( irrespective of figure of power looms ) were plotted ( Fig ; 3.1 ) in order to understand the fluctuation of noise with three clip slots viz.

9:00 AM, 12:00 PM and 9:00 PM. It is apparent from Fig. 3.1 that the noise pollution ( degree ) is higher at dark and lower at 12:00 midday ( irrespective of figure of machines ) .

The sound strength is given by the undermentioned expression ( beginning: Sharma, 1996 ) :I = 2Iˆ2n2a2I?v aˆ¦aˆ¦aˆ¦.. ( 3.1 )Where I=intensity of soundn= frequencea= amplitude of the moving ridgeI?= denseness of mediumV = velocity of the moving ridgeFor a given machine, since the other factors are changeless,I I?Therefore, the noise strength will increases with the addition in denseness of medium. During twenty-four hours, the temperature of Earth additions and denseness lessenings, taking to decrease in sound speed and accordingly decrease in noise strength ( I ) .

Similarly, the air is denser at dark due to decrease in temperature doing addition in denseness and accordingly increase in strength.Fig. 3.1: Average Noise Level Graph ( at 9:00 AM, 12:00 PM and 9:00 PM )

3.3 Variation of Noise Pollution ( Level ) with Number of Power Looms

The relationship between the figure of machines and mean noise degree ( for eight sites ) is shown in Fig.

3.2.It is apparent from Fig. 3.2 that figure of machines does non hold much consequence on mean noise degree.Trend LinesFig.

3.2: Graph demoing relation between figure of machines and noise degreeAs we know summing up of noise degree from different beginnings does non follow regulation of arithmetic summing up as sound force per unit area degrees in dBs ( dubnium ) or A-weighted dBs [ dubnium ( A ) ] are based on a logarithmic graduated table. If one machine emits a sound degree of 90 dubnium, and a 2nd indistinguishable machine is placed beside the first, the combined sound degree is 93 dubnium, non 180 dubnium.

If there are two sound beginnings in a room – for illustration a machine bring forthing an mean sound degree of 62.0 dubnium, and another machine bring forthing a sound degree of 73.0 dubnium, so the entire sound degree is a logarithmic amount i.e.

Combined sound degree = 10 ten log ( 10^ ( 62/10 ) + 10^ ( 73/10 ) )= 73.3 dubniumFor two different sounds, the combined degree can non be more than 3 dubniums above the higher of the two sound degrees. However, if the sounds are phase related there can be up to a 6dB addition in SPL.

3.4 Effectss of Building Structure on the Noise Pollution

The power loom based industries varies non merely by figure of machines but besides by the construction type e.g. plastered or unplastered wall, with or without Windowss, R.C.

C. or G.I. ceilings etc. A typical workshop of power loom based industries is shown in Fig.

3.3. The noise informations with regard to the construction type are summarized in Table 3.2. The mean noise level/unit country with regard to observation clip is besides calculated and summarized in Table 3.

3. The mean noise degree for 24 hr is given in Table 3.4.Unplastered wallMeshed wallGI SheetFig. 3.3: A Typical Power loom Workshop

Table 3.

2: Variation in Noise Level Due to Texture and Types of Ceiling

( a ) GI Roofing with Unplastered wall ( GI UP )

S.No.

Area ( sq. foot )

Reading ( dubnium )

Divided by country

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

1600092.8492.7998.540.015470.

015460.016422640095.9497.

25103.650.014920.015190.016193490098.

0297.6799.590.02000.019930.020324640096.

1996.6998.690.015020.01510.015425560096.4298.1796.

160.017210.017530.017176120098.9699.90102.270.082460.

08300.0085276000100.6498.6298.580.016770.0164360.

0164383600102.68102.25102.330.

028500.028400.02842990098.8998.4399.730.

109870.109360.11081101600103.22103.00111.320.064510.

064370.069571122594.1796.4099.080.

418530.428440.440351237591.7992.2393.910.

244770.2459470.2504313175093.8294.0295.640.053610.0537260.

0546514240097.8097.89100.120.040750.0407880.

04172151500101.21101.34101.

580.067470.067560.06772

Average Noise Degree

0.08066

0.

081416

0.07828

( B ) GI Roofing with Plastered wall ( GI P )

S.No.

Area ( sq. foot )

Reading ( dubnium )

Divided by country

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

1800101.72102.41109.

740.127150.1280130.1371822000101.32101.74110.

580.050660.050870.05529315095.

6596.74101.420.637670.6449330.

67613

Average Noise Degree

0.27183

0.274605

0.28953

( degree Celsius ) RCC Roofing with Unplastered wall ( RCC UP )

S.No.

Area ( sq. foot )

Reading ( dubnium )

Divided by country

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

1100099.99102.

56103.160.099990.102560.

10316215097.1398.26113.

620.647530.6550670.7574731000102.25102.41103.680.

102250.102410.10368450092.2592.56101.770.

18450.185120.203545600101.06111.

6118.840.168430.1860.

19807

Average Noise Degree

0.24054

0.246231

0.27318

( vitamin D ) RCC Roofing with Plastered wall ( RCC P )

S.No.

Area ( sq. foot )

Reading ( dubnium )

Divided by country

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

9:00AM

12:00PM

9:00PM

11000097.

5997.27101.850.009760.0097270.01019222596.1899.

5100.340.427470.4422220.445963200094.7394.5995.150.

047370.0472950.04758

Average Noise Degree

0.16153

0.

166415

0.16791

Table 3.3: Average Noise Level V. Structure Type

Structure Type

Observation clip

9:00 AM

12:00 Autopsy

9:00 Autopsy

GI UP0.080660.

081420.07828GI P0.271830.274610.

28953RCC UP0.240540.246230.27318RCC P0.161530.

166410.16791Where, GI UP = Galvanized Iron unplasteredGI P = Galvanized Iron plasteredRCC UP = Reinforced Cement Concrete unplasteredRCC P = Reinforced Cement Concrete plasteredThe saloon graph between construction type and noise level/area at 9:00AM, 12:00 PM and 9:00 PM are plotted in Figures 3.4, 3.5 and 3.

6 severally. From these graphs, it is clear that unit noise degree is lowest in instance of GI UP ( G.I. Unplastered ) and upper limit in instance of GI P ( G.I. Plastered ) .

However, RCC UP ( RCC Unplastered ) is in close understanding with GI ( P ) . The same tendency is observed in Fig. 3.

7. Thus it may be recommended that GI Unplastered construction is more suited construction for power loom based fabric industries.RCC PTypes of ceilingRCC UPGI PGI UPFig. 3.

4: Noise Level/unit country at 9:00 AmericiumsTypes of ceilingRCC PRCC UPGI PGI UPFig. 3.5: Noise Level/unit country at 12:00 AutopsyGI PRCC UPRCC PGI UPTypes of ceilingFig.

3.6: Noise Level/unit country at 9:00 Autopsy

Table 3.4: Average Noise Level with regard to Structure Type

Structure Type

Average Noise Level ( dubnium )

GI UP0.08012GI P0.27866RCC UP0.25332RCC P0.16528

Types of ceiling

GI UP

GI P

RCC UP

RCC P

Fig.

3.7: Concluding norm reading taken at 9:00 AM, 12:00 PM, & A ; 9:00 AutopsyFollowing are the other factors which influences the noise degree:Room Parameters: In smaller suites noise degree is more because sound continues to go in the room even after multiple contemplations. On the other manus in larger suites energy of sound moving ridges is dissipated while going from one surface to other, and hence contemplations will be less and this consequences into lesser noise degree.Wall Texture: Sound soaking up occurs when some or all of the incident sound energy is either converted into heat or passed through the absorber.A room with good absorbing surfaces will hold lesser noise degree. An unfastened window is a perfect absorber ; as it absorbs all the acoustical energy incident on it, but here insularity will be hapless as more noise energy is transferred outside the room.

3.5 Relationship between Theoretical and Measured Noise Level

Decibel readings of a sound spectrum necessitate to be added and converted to a individual reading.

The entire dB degree matching to a sound spectrum may be given by the expression ( Sincero and Sincero, 1996 )aˆ¦aˆ¦aˆ¦.. ( 3.2 )Using the above equation, the theoretical noise degree based on the information of individual machine was used to happen out the theoretical noise degree for 8 machines. The same was compared with the mensural noise degree for 8 machines and % mistake was calculated and the complete information is given in Table 3.5. No peculiar tendency between the theoretical and mensural noise degree was observed but it was found that the theoretical noise degree was less than the mensural noise degree.

Table 3.5: Relationship between Theoretical and Measured Noise Level

S. No.

Noise Recorded 1 Machine

Noise Recorded 8 Machine

Noise Theoretical 8Machine

C=10 log ( 10^ ( C3/10 ) + 10^ ( C4/10 ) aˆ¦ . )

Error %

185.

296.894.232.

6528797.396.031.30387.

299.396.233.0949099.899.030.

7758799.196.033.09686.

798.495.732.71786.798.

995.733.20887.199.496.

133.28986.898.

695.832.801086.998.695.932.701185.

398.994.334.611287.198.

496.132.301387.397.996.331.601490.

199.999.130.761587.298.

596.232.301685.

698.294.633.631785.498.494.434.031887.698.896.632.191987.898.396.831.492088.99997.931.072185.698.894.634.212287.298.696.232.402387.398.596.332.202488.498.297.430.782588.598.997.531.382685.398.494.334.132785.49894.433.642886.598.295.532.712986.398.895.333.513084.99993.935.123184.398.493.335.153285.898.494.833.62338698.895.033.813486.298.695.233.413585.898.494.833.623687.198.596.132.403787.297.496.231.203886.398.895.333.513987.498.896.432.394083.398.692.336.35

3.6 Variation of Noise Level with Distance

In order to understand the fluctuation of noise with the distance off from the beginning of noise coevals, foremost the noise information was collected within the workshop, so at the door of the workshop, and so at the distances of 10 m, 20 m and 25 m off from the workshop. Collected information is given in Table 3.6 and related graph is shown in Fig. 3.8. It is observed from the Fig. 3.8 that the noise degree decreases with increasing distance.

Table 3.6: Variation of Noise Level with Distance

Distance ( m )

Average Noise Level ( dubnium )

1 Machine

% Decrease

Multiple Machine ( 8 )

% Decrease

Inside Workshop ( 0m )86.6925098.540At the door of the Workshop ( 2m )83.77253.4887.7912.29At 10 m78.652510.2280.3522.60At 20 m67.057529.2968.1944.49At 25 m61.77540.3362.5557.53Fig. 3.8: Graph demoing fluctuation of noise degree with distanceThe per centum decrease is plotted in Figure 3.9Fig. 3.9: Graph demoing percent decrease in noise degreeThe sound strength I at a distance R from a point noise beginning radiating uniformly in all waies in the surrounding is Pw / 4 Iˆr2, where 4 Iˆr2 is the spherical country having the noise. Hence sound strength at a distance R from the beginning may be written as ( Sincero, 1996 ) .aˆ¦aˆ¦aˆ¦aˆ¦ ( 3.3 )Where Q = coefficient of directionality ( a invariable )Pw = power ( changeless for a beginning )4 Iˆr2 = a spherical country equivalent to having the noiseSo, sound strength I 1/r2 aˆ¦aˆ¦aˆ¦ . ( 3.4 )It is clear from equation ( 3.4 ) that the sound strength decreases with the distance R from beginning.

x

Hi!
I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out