Identification Of Unknown Soil Bacteria Biology Essay

Microorganisms play an highly of import function in dirt ecology. Soil bacteria interrupt down organic affair into simpler compounds ( Clark ) . Bacteria in the dirt drama of import functions in different biochemical rhythms such as the C rhythm ( Clark ) . Decomposition is another of import function that different bacteriums take portion in. Without bacteria the ecology of dirt would be wholly disrupted. The alimentary demands that different bacteriums need to last make up one’s mind where each bacterium can be found.

Agricultural dirt would hold a wholly different array of micro-organisms so soil found in a wood would hold. Different conditions such as wet, N, O and C dioxide degrees, temperature and pH of the dirt will all find which types of bacteriums will populate in thrive in agricultural and forest dirt. The aim of this experiment was to seek to insulate and place one specific dirt bacterium from either forest or agricultural dirt. The bacterium in this study was isolated from agricultural dirt and utilizing the morphology of the single cells and settlement along the types of chemicals that would respond with the bacteriums along with what type of extremes the bacteriums could last in the bacterium was identified.MethodGet downing from an original one gm sample of agricultural dirt a 10-2 dilution was created and used to make a Tryptic Soy Agar ( TSA ) run home base ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . The civilizations that arose from the run home base were observed and the morphology of a specific settlement was described and recorded ( Egger 2010 ) . A subculture was created from one settlement on a new TSA run home base. A gm discoloration was prepared utilizing the original settlement of dirt bacteriums and whether it was gram negative or gram positive was recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Using the new subculture several biochemical trials were performed. A individual line of bacterium was streaked onto a amylum agar home base and after incubation beads of I were added to the civilization and if amylum is hydrolyzed a colour alteration occurred, consequences were recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . On a Sulfide, Indole, and Motility ( SIM ) deep the bacterium isolate was stabbed into the tubing A? of the manner down ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . After incubation the deep was observed for motion off from the original line and three beads of Kovac ‘s Reagent was added to see if a colour alteration occurred ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . The consequences of the motility and H2S decrease trials were recorded. The bacterium isolate was besides assorted in a peptone stock tubing and after incubation a bead of Nessler ‘s reagent and the cringle of broth solution were assorted in a topographic point home base and the consequences were recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . A cringle of bacterium was put into ammonium sulphate and nitrite broth tubings. In a topographic point home base on cringle of the ammonium sulphate stock was assorted with 1 bead of Nessler ‘s reagent and another cringle was assorted with three beads of Trommsdorf ‘s reagent and a bead of dilute H2SO4 ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) .

Besides in the topographic point plate the nitrite stock was tested with Trommsdorf ‘s reagent and dilute H2SO4 every bit good as with concentrated H2SO4 and aniline ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . The consequences for the four trials were recorded. To prove for denitrification reagents A and B were added to the nitrate stock tubing with the unknown bacteriums and the colour alteration of the tubing was recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . The unknown isolate was inoculated in a tubing of thioglycollate medium and after incubation any growing in the tubing was noted and recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . To prove the bacterium for catalase and oxidase bacterium was streaked on a TSA home base and after incubation beads of 3 % H peroxide was put on one terminal of the run and the formation or deficiency of bubbles was recorded for catalase, and oxidase was tested on the opposite terminal of the run and the consequences were noted ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . To prove what temperature the unknown bacteriums turn best at 4 TSA home bases were streaked with the bacteriums and each home base was incubated at a different temperature, after incubation any growing on the home bases was recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . To prove the optimum pH for the bacteriums to turn the bacterium was inoculated into tubings that were each at a different pH ( pH 3, 5, 7, & A ; 9 ) after incubation the pH that the bacterium grew the best in was recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) . TSA home bases were besides streaked with the unknown bacteriums to prove in what sum of Na chloride it could turn in, home bases with concentrations of 0,0.

5, 2 and 5 % Na chloride were used any growing was recorded ( Robertson and Egger 2010 ) .ConsequenceThe unknown bacteria is rod molded and gram positive and the settlement formed is a raised white circle ( Table 1 ) . Trials showed that the bacteria was positive for ammonification and denitrification from NO3- to NO2- ( Table 1 ) . Catalase and oxidase trial besides were positive for this bacterium ( Table 1 ) .

The bacteria is besides a facultative anaerobe ( Table 1 ) . Table 1 besides shows that the unknown bacteria does non exhibit motility. The unknown bacterium was found to hydrolyse amylum, but was negative for cut downing H2S ( Table 1 ) . The unknown bacteria besides does non exhibit nitrification ( Table 1 ) . The optimum temperature of the unknown bacterium was found to be about 37A°C and had an optimum pH of 5 its optimum salt concentrations was besides found to be at 0-0.

5 % Na chloride ( Table 1 ) .Table 1: What trials were used to place dirt bacteriums and the consequence of the trialTrialConsequenceColony morphologyRaised white circleCell morphologyRod shapedGram discolorationpositiveStarch hydrolysispositiveH2S decreasenegativeMotilitynegativeAmmonificationpositiveDenitrificationpositive NO3- to NO2-NitrificationnegativeCatalasePositiveOxidasePositiveOxygen tolerancefacultative anaerobeOptimum Temperature37Optimal pH5Optimal salt concentration0-0.05 %DiscussionThe dirt bacterium key created by KN Egger ( 2010 ) was used to place what household the unknown bacteriums belongs to. The closest lucifer that could be found utilizing the Common Soil Bacteria Key was Actinomyces. A lucifer could non be made to a genus. Actinomyce are a Gram positive, rod shaped household. Actinomycess are non found to cut down H2S or have important motility.

From the consequences in Table 1 we can reason that the bacteria is a mesophile every bit good as an acidophile. We can besides reason from Table 1 that the bacteria is osmotolerant and a facultative anaerobe. Many different trials could hold been used to foster aid place the bacterial isolate ; the most accurate trials would hold been to prove the Deoxyribonucleic acid or nucleic acids of the bacteriums.

Many different biochemical trials could hold been used such as lactose and glucose. No trial consequence can be considered wholly accurate the bacterium could hold been contaminated every bit good as non every bacterium settlement will act precisely the same. It is highly difficult to sort a specific bacteria without several more trials to safely reason that it belongs in the chosen group Actinomyces.


I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out