Goodman Vs Robin Essay Research Paper Separate

Goodman Vs Robin Essay, Research PaperSeparate JourneiesMichael FreelShort narratives, when written by the same writer, vary by capable but sometimes incorporate similar subjects. Nathaniel Hawthorne was an entertaining author who wrote many such narratives. Two among his plants have some dramatic similarities. & # 8220 ; Young Goodman Brown & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; My Kinsman, Major Molineux & # 8221 ; both were written within three old ages of each other by Hawthorne ( 1832-1835 ) . The biggest similarities between the narratives were with the chief character of each.

Robin from & # 8220 ; My Kinsman, Major Molineux & # 8221 ; and Brown from & # 8220 ; Young Goodman Brown & # 8221 ; were both immature work forces on a journey that took them through a individual dark. Both work forces held some inexperienced person or sodium? ve worldviews. Both had idealistic positions of people that were proven to be untrue. Both work forces experienced events that should be perceived as symbolic.

However, each adult male met a different destiny.Both Robin and Brown took journeys that changed their lives everlastingly. Both of these journeys took topographic point largely under the screen of darkness. That was symbolic of the naivet? of both work forces. Both work forces met a series of people on their journey that turned up subsequently in a different visible radiation.

Robin met a big adult male in an hostel. When he subsequently saw him once more, he saw the adult male as adult male with a two-toned black and ruddy face. The alteration was merely a symbolic 1 that reflected Robin & # 8217 ; s position of the immorality of the adult male. Brown experienced something similar with the character Goody Cloyse, who he thought a devote Christian. Subsequently, he saw her on the route chew the fating with the Satans like they were old friends. Both work forces had an idealised character. Greater than the alterations in the minor characters, both work forces had their positions of their idealised character wholly changed, which changes their life.

Brown & # 8217 ; s married woman Faith symbolized his religion, so he held an idealised position of her. At the terminal of his journey, she appears at the Satan & # 8217 ; s ceremonial, which is symbolic of his loss of religion. He ne’er sees her in the same manner once more.

Robin thought that his kinsman Major Molineux was a extremely well-thought-of member of his community and a great adult male. At the terminal of his journey, Robin sees him tarred and feathered looking non really great at all. He finds out that the people of the town hated, non respectevitamin D, this adult male because of his support of the British. Though their aims on these journeys were different, both work forces experienced a similar loss of artlessness. Though the procedure was similar, the results of their journeys were different.The intent of each adult male & # 8217 ; s journey was different.

Brown & # 8217 ; s journey was a systematic dislocation of his religion. It succeeded. All the people he held every bit pious and in high respect were found out to be involved with the Satan. Brown was inflexible and allowed this to for good interrupt his religion in humanity.

He became & # 8220 ; a after part, a sad, a darkly meditative, a distrustful, if non despairing adult male & # 8221 ; after the events of his journey. The remainder of his life & # 8220 ; he shrank from the bosom of Faith. & # 8221 ; Brown led an unhappy life because he lost his religion. Robin on the other manus did non. His journey was a systematic dislocation of another kind.

His journey served the intent of altering the sodium? ve state boy he was into a adult male of the metropolis who sees things for what they truly are. His journey was besides a success. His misconceptions about metropolis life were lifted. By speaking to people, he found they were non as friendly or generous as he may hold hoped. He found there was a conflict brewing that was coercing the citizens of the metropolis to take sides. By the terminal of his journey, Robin saw the metropolis as it was. He was no longer a sodium? ve state male child.

Because of this, he was so allowed the chance to remain in the metropolis and grow. Robin & # 8217 ; s journey forced him to hold a coming of age.Robin and Brown & # 8217 ; s journeys were slightly similar in the experiences they had along the manner. Both met people that changed along the class of the journey. Both had their perceptual experiences about people altered.

Both had their lives changed for good. The intent and results of their journey were different nevertheless. Brown & # 8217 ; s journey had a negative stoping while Robin & # 8217 ; s journey ended on a more impersonal note. Brown died unhappy. Robin had his vision of his uncle shattered, but grew stronger as a consequence of his experiences.

One lost his religion while the other had a coming of age. Though their journeys had similarities, they were really different because of the results.BibliographyYoung Goodman Brown and other short narratives by Nathaniel Hawthorne