Environmental impact assessment report Essay


The appraisal shall be made for a air current farm company suggesting to construct a air current farm on specified site on Rombalds Moor, Ilkley. It is a necessary portion of any edifice proposal with the purpose to place and foretell the impact on the environment it shall be based in, functioning as an tool for preventive environmental direction, and shall guarantee that appropriate attending is paid to the possible environmental issues at manus. Environmental impact appraisal facilitates the client to see what environmental factors should be given due weight, along with economic or societal factors, when planning applications are being considered.

EIA will advance a sustainable form of physical development and land and belongings usage in metropoliss, towns and the countryside. If decently carried out, it benefits all those involved in the planning procedure, and helps to explicate the grounds for why it can be a possible positive result.The appraisal shall follow the immediate processs in EIA ;

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now
  1. Screening
  2. Scoping
  3. Prediction and planning
  4. Appraisal of impacts
  5. Extenuation
  6. EIS
  7. Monitoring

EIA, ( 2009 )The power from air current farms is critical to undertaking planetary heating, and doing the Kyoto protocol more possible. Wind power is a clean, renewable energy beginning, which during operation produces no C dioxide, or by merchandises harmful to the environment. It is a really attractive pick for energy supply, with few pollutants, if known. Wind power, like hydroelectric and solar are in changeless, natural supply in the environment, and do non demand digging, or any immediate change to the bing environment one time in operation. Unlike the instance of other renewable energy beginnings like atomic energy, there is no unsafe by merchandise, like U, that must be carefully stored for centuries after.

With the UK ‘s Kyoto mark of a 12.5 % decrease in nursery gas emanations from 1990 degrees, the UK must now look for ‘cleaner ‘ beginnings of energy, and air current farms match the standards, and seem to be a premier campaigner. Harmonizing to a BBC article on air current farms, “The UK has the best and most geographically diverse air current resources in Europe, more than plenty to run into current renewable energy targets. & A ; Rdquo ; ( BBC, 2005 ) Wind power is the most advanced renewable engineering available at a big graduated table during this clip period, and seems to be the most profitable in the environmental sense ( Miller,2008 ) .The assessment shall analyze 5 sites that are potentially suited for the execution of a air current farm, whilst using the 7 stairss of the EIA process. The testing study will be made up of one subdivision which shall try to unwrap the demand for an environment impact appraisal.

Screening Opinion:

Wind turbines harness the kinetic energy from air current and the generator converts it to electricity through the action of the turning blades. The turbines typically last for 20-25 old ages with the demand for replacing parts and service of turbines yearly to let optimal public presentation.

They require a strong air current resource which this country has due to exposure to the predominating south western air currents, which come from the Atlantic. The air current turbines proposed to be built are similar to those set at the Ovenden air current farm, on Ovenden Moor, which are 31.5m to hub, and 48.9m to tip ( EON ) . In relativity they are the same tallness as a 3 floor house, nevertheless this is non analogy, they do look less obvious on the landscape. They are white on coloring material and non noticeable to the skyline because of this, and the fact that they are tall and thin. It should be noted that one of the cardinal environmental issues is the tallness and subtly of the air current turbines for avifloral species, and the possible impact on them.

The country of land on which they are proposed to be built on is moorland, and in specially designated land, with a big array of zoology and vegetation, which have the possible to be affected. The Rombalds Moor is overlooks the town of Keighley ( 3 stat mis ) , the small towns of Riddlesden ( 0.75 stat mis ) and West Morton ( 0.5 stat mis ) . There are a broad scope of factors which need to be measuring in order to supply an overview of what might perchance happen and any procurance for this. Rombalds Moor has a similar environment to that of the Ovenden air current farm site illustrated in ( figure 1 ) which is about 200 hectares and contains 23 air current turbines.

Due to the belongingss of the proposed environment and the building, it seems favorable to utilize EIA to come to a decision on the most suited site and would necessitate to attach to any planning application.


For any building the overall impacts must be to the full comprehended, and in due class the issues that have the possible to originate must be understood excessively, but for these to be evaluated a certain elements specific to the site must be farther investigated.

  • Which impacts should be considered?
  • What are the sites characteristics/and nature?
  • What are the stages of the undertaking?
  • What is the scope/scale of the undertaking?
  • What are the general negatives to its environment?
  • Is there any Ancillary Development?
  • What are the proposed extenuation steps?

These are some of the parts of information that need to be investigated before the appraisal can be carried out.

Appraisal of impacts:

This subdivision shall supply the necessary tools and descriptions of the site to understand the suitableness of the 5 sites proposed to construct the air current farm. Locate A, SITE B, SITE C, SITE D, and SITE E will all to some extent be affected by certain facets of the environment, and potentially impact the 200 hectares that will be contained for the site. Wind farms of the size that are to be built, similar to those at Ovenden typically last for 20-25 old ages ( Gipe, 2009 ) though like Oveneden, they require one-year care. The sites are all located on the Moors, with the little exclusion of sight D ; nevertheless have the same environmental features.

The chief flora consists of ling, cotton grass, and whortleberry and bracken moorland with countries of rugged grassland. The prevailing activities include grouse shot and low denseness farm graze, with hapless infertile grade 5 agricultural land. The moorland is partly segmented by dry rock walls, which indicate the extent of the unfastened Moor and its boundaries.

The sites indicate degrees of tree screen which is limited to contract belts and occasional blocks of conifer forest at the moorland border seen along sites A, B and E. Most of the country is selected as a Particular Area of Conservation, a Particular Protection Area and a SSSI ( SPA informations signifier ) puting it under stiff and regulated planning policies ( LPA ) . There are few edifices and any signifier of old building includes dry rock walls, rock butts, masts and entree paths, and are maintained with traditional edifice stuffs such as gritrock.

The country is archeologically vulnerable with several rock markers and grounds of colony dating back perchance to the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, due to the grounds of rock circles and ‘cup and pealing ‘ marked stones ( OS map ) in specifically sites A and B ( see Map 1 ) . The sites have several designated and some stray public pathwaies and paths that reach into the moorland plus entree paths for landholders, doing handiness reasonably easy and common at all sites.

Prediction and planning:


The is a possibility for the environing countries to be affected by the air current turbines specifically, sites D, and E which against the chart mark 5 ( D ) and 4 ( E ) , which are both in propinquity ( 0.75m ) to Riddlesden which has a population of over 300.

The other 5 sites are at least 2 stat mis from any major townships/villages.


Ecological study work has been undertaken on the application site by the ‘Natura 2000 ‘ SPA study under disposal by the JNCC ( Joint Nature Conservation Committee ) . Making all sites debatable, and in the event of a proposal – non applicable in these locations.

Sites A, B, C, and E are all in the environments designated as fragile under the SPA study, doing D the most suited in this instance, whilst E resides within protected forestry.Dirts: The application Site comprises preponderantly unfastened moorland which is used partly for graze, and recreational Walkers. Rombalds Moor has the common features of any Moor, and these include, preponderantly waterlogged, peaty dirt, which is known to be both hard to construct on and a natural fuel resource ( LIFE, 2008 ) . Peat frequently slides on inclines, which is specifically the grounds for why site D an E are non suited, whereas the flatter countries such as A, B, C -specifically where there are small or no inclines. Slopes potentially lead to run off, and dirts that are normally H2O logged can potentially do surface run-off. With the building of a air current turbine site, roads would necessitate to be built which combined with the high H2O storage capacity of peat would farther increase run-off and possible pollutants. Site D has the most fertile dirt, and is presently under usage for agriculture, the dirt is less peaty and hence would look uneconomical for the usage of a air current farm, whereas countries A, B, C and E are in less fertile locations, doing them less controversial in an agricultural position.Water: The application site is non located within a flood plain, or inundation hazard country, though certain sites are closer to H2O classs than others.

Identified possible effects on natural resources would hence necessitate an appraisal of the consequence of the proposed development on H2O supply and drainage, which would be included within the EIS. Looking at *Map 1 ( Google ) there are obvious H2O classs, such as the canal than run through Riddlesden and along the underside of site D, doing it possible risky, when under building due to its abruptness, which would accordingly do run off. Locate A, B, & A ; C are furthest from any H2O and mark low in the subdivision on the chart, bespeaking suitableness for building at these sites.


This of class is an of import component of the air current turbine, and the handiness to it is important, the nearer the better for a site, as it means less building and lowered costs.

Site D, C and B are closest to power grids, in that order, and are at that place forward more suited, D is in close propinquity to both Keighley and Riddlesden doing it ideal for this factor. Site C is near an stray mast at the top terminal of Ilkley route, leting easy entree to the grid. Both A and E are non, there forward unsuitable in this scenario.

Heritage and Archeology:

The tabular array below illustrates that site C has the least sum of archeological sites with site ( A ) holding the most. Archaeological sites are protected and under the LPA ordinances this can non be permitted, and is to be lest undisturbed and non to be removed. The maps show that site A, and B are most archeologically vulnerable with several rock markers and grounds of colony dating back perchance to the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, due to the grounds of rock circles and ‘cup and pealing ‘ marked stones ( OS map ) ( see Map 1 ) .

Site C has the lowest because of the deficiency of archeological sites doing them more passable by Torahs and ordinances maintained by the LPA

Elevation and Slope:

Sites that are steep would non be suited for any signifier of building, handiness for conveying turbines and care vehicles to the sites would be debatable, and dirt run-off would be a hazard excessively. Site with higher lifts would have more air current, increasing kinetic activity on the turbines, and doing increased rotary velocities, which would intend more power coevals. Though it is evident that sites with higher lift would be more seeable those on a level and a big distance from urban countries such as site C would bring forth an eye-saw on the landscape. With increased turbine rotary motion noise might increase, nevertheless to guarantee nuisance effects do non happen to environing countries site C provides the suited distance to avoid this. Besides sing that the prevailing air current found to be from the south West, mean that sound to the urban countries of Riddlesden and Keighley would be diminished greatly. In this instance site C seems most applicable.

Public entree and Traffic:

Public entree and traffic have a important consequence on the local and strategic route web, as they would increase traffic and perturbation throughout the station operation and building of the turbines. C and E are the furthest from roads, though site C has no designated pes waies on the map, and would be less controversial in the positions of touristry and Walkers.

Conclusive Scoping:

The site that seems most appropriate is C, the site has no archeological land Markss and foot waies on it, it is the least steep, and furthest off from any urban countries. Looking at the chart below one can obviously see the consequences of the matrix:


  1. EIA, ( 2009 ) Lecture notes, EIA Process, pg 7
  2. BBC, ( 2005 ) Wind farms ‘must take root in UK ‘ , hypertext transfer protocol: //news.bbc.


  3. Miller, G. T. , et Al, ( 2008 ) Populating in the Environment: Principles, Connections, and Solutions, Cengage Learning, Ed.

    16, pp 419-420

  4. Eon, Ovenden air current farm, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.eon-uk.com/generation/ovendenmoor.aspx
  5. Google, OS map, Ilkley Moor hypertext transfer protocol: //mapzone.ordnancesurvey.


  6. SPA informations signifier South Pennines ( 2006 ) , NATURA 2000, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.jncc.gov.uk/pdf/SPA/UK9007022.


  7. Gipe, P. , ( 2009 ) Wind Energy Basicss: ‘A Guide to Home- and Community-Scale Wind-Energy Systems, ‘ Chelsea Green Publishing, Ed.2 illustrated, pp123-124
  8. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bradford.


  9. LIFE, City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council. , ( 1998 ) Rombalds Moor: Management Strategy to profit Annex 1 species, LIFE study Bradford Council
  10. Ilkley Management Plan ( 2003 ) , http: //www.bradford.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/3A5A0C6B-CB84-4AE3-8F13-5481F0BCAAA5/0/ilkley_moor_management_plan.pdf % 20-
  11. LPA, Local Planning Authority www.pas.gov.uk/pas/core/page.do? pageId=12397

I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out