Earning Management Remains As The Main Issues Concern By The Investors Accounting Essay

Gaining direction remains as the chief issues concern by the investors, analysts and public in all over the universe. The consciousness of gaining direction activities is become increasing after Enron instance in the USA and World Com issues every bit good as HIH in Australia ( Johl.S, Jubb.C.A and Houghton K.A. , 2007 ) .

Beside, audit quality besides being questionable and concern after all these dirts and theoretical research shows that quality audit dramas in of import function in order to avoid and extenuate earning direction activities Chen K.Y et Al, ( 2005 ) .Beneish M.D, 2001 had cited the definition of gaining direction by Schipper, 1989 as the purpose of intervention in the external fiscal coverage procedure with the intent of deriving some personal benefit by seting reported net incomes in the company. In the other manus, harmonizing to Guidelines on Audit Quality, 2009, “ quality ” of audit is defined as the extent to which a set of built-in features of an audit fulfils demands. This may include the important of audit undertakings, dependability of audit findings, objectiveness and lucidity of audit sentiment, the range and seasonableness of audit public presentation and the most of import is the efficiency and effectivity of the audit activities and its findings.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

The chief aim of this survey is to analyze the relationship between audit quality and gaining direction in the regard of transverse state surveies. This paper is organized as follows. The following subdivision discusses the old literature surveies on net incomes direction and audit quality. This is followed by cross states study on relation to the audit quality and gaining direction in different position such as gaining direction measuring in term if audit quality ( size and industry expert ) and intervention of the investors every bit good as the earning direction pattern during IPO procedure. This survey may include the treatment from Europe, Malaysia and Taiwan and the paper ends with a decision and treatments.2.

0 LITERATURER REVIEWGaining ManagementMany old bookmans ‘ surveies on the relationship between audit quality and earning direction pattern. Earning Management is the scheme done by the directors to derive an inducement by pull stringsing the earning in the company. The quality of the fiscal consequences is being unfastened to discussion where the fiscal statement users believed that the profitableness of the company ‘s is associated with the director ‘s compensations. Harmonizing to Hirst ( 1994 ) , if the hearers expect and believe that directors have incentive to make gaining direction activities, consequence shows that high possibilities of the bing of material misstatement in the fiscal statements might be occurred.Therefore, the perceptual experience on the quality of fiscal coverage will be justice on the hearer ‘s duties where the audit qualities are important towards restraining the earning direction activities. It is because ; the bar of misdirecting fiscal coverage is one of the chief functions that should be performed by the hearers. Earning direction is being pattern in the companies by pull stringsing the earning figure either addition net incomes or income decreasing accounting ( Krishnan, 1999 ) . Directors in the companies increase the reported earning before traveling to public in order to derive higher portion monetary value.

They tend to prosecute in gaining direction activities because they are seeking to set up higher marker monetary value and increase their company ‘s repute ( Ebrahim A. , 2001 ) . Beside that, Krishnan, 1999 besides argue that the quality of audit performed will be used to find aggressive gaining direction activities. Johl. et.al.

( 2007 ) describe audit quality is measured is dependent on hearer quality as the ability to observe and willingness to describe material manipulation/misstatements giving rise to material uncertainnesss or/and traveling concern jobs. Therefore old survey suggested that Big 4 and not Big 4 audit houses has important different in mensurating the earning direction which most on client with Large 4 engage lesser in gaining direction compared to those company with non Big 4 audit houses ( Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, 2006, Johl. et.

al. 2007 ) .2.2 Audit QualitySizeMeasurement of audit qualities is varies among the audit house either Big 4 or non-Big 4 companies. Harmonizing to Tendeloo B.

V. and Vanstraelen A. ( 2005 ) and Carlin, Finch, and Laili ( 2008 ) , old bookmans fundamentally use the dichotomous Big 4 or non-Big 4 audit variable to capture audit quality differences.Many of the surveies show that the quality audit is based on the hearer ‘s size which it mentioning to the Numberss of client they had and the fees they earned ( Ebrahim A.

2001 and ( Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, 2006 ) . This had been supported by Salleh Z, Stewart J and Manson S. ( 2006 ) where they found that the auditee size as measured by grosss is found to be associated with audit fees as they need to execute grater audit attempt. Ebrahim A. ( 2000 ) added that most of the companies who involved in gaining direction are come from the non-big auditing house ‘s client comparison to the clients of the large auditing houses.

This has been supported by Tendeloo B.V. and Vanstraelen A. ( 2005 ) and ( Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, 2006 ) where the consequence shows that larger audit houses are anticipated to be likely to execute high-quality audits.

With effectual audit, they are able to place the likely of material misstatement and can constraint the earning direction activities. Furthermore, Big house company will execute high quality audit because they will confronting high possibilities to lose in footings of clients and audit fees in instance of an audit failure. Therefore, larger audit houses has ability provided that a larger limitation on net incomes direction.On the other manus, one could reason that, larger audit house depending on their international repute and trade name, hence could heighten the demand from clients to seek services and sentiment from Large 4 audit houses ( Tendeloo B.V. and Vanstraelen A.

, 2005 ) . The high demand from the client is could be due to the inducement and the resources that the Big 4 had from where they can provide high quality audit. Thus it shows the size of audit houses besides has important impact towards the client pick and will reflect to the earning direction activities ( Johl. et.al.

2007 ) .Industry ExpertBeside the size of audit houses, most of the client particularly from the private company believed that Big 4 audit house had hearer ‘s expert in the range of industry public presentation. This issue had been highlighted by Krishnan. G.

V, ( 2003 ) where he notices that audit quality besides can be measure by the hearer ‘s industries expertise. From here we can see that, hearers who had good experience in industry will take to execute high quality audit every bit good as the ability to observe any deceitful activities by their clients. Industry experienced by the hearers will heighten ability to observe fraud ( Krishnan. G.V, 2003 ) .

Audit effectivity performed by the hearers usually associate with the audit quality where it is depending on the truth of hearer ‘s free mistake frequence cognition ( Krishnan, 2003 ) . He added that by deriving industrial experiences, Large houses can farther heighten the credibleness and quality of accounting information.However, based on the experient addition in the industries, many of the Big 4 hearers will go a specialist hearer.

This specializer hearers are adept in observing any duplicity action and able to detect any signal of fiscal hurt in the client ‘s fiscal statements. As a consequence, specializer hearer has ability to observe and restrain earning direction activities as good due to the handinesss of the resources, industry expertness and inducement that they had ( Krishnan, 2003 ) . However, the surveies conducted by Chen K.

Y et Al, ( 2005 ) found that non all the industry specializer hearers come from Big 4 companies.In the regard of audit fees, there are some different between the fees charged by the Big audit house and non-audit house. This may due to the different Numberss of clients and complexness of the audit activities ( Johl. et.al. ( 2007 ) . Big 4 companies charged higher fees because of their repute and the handinesss of the specializer hearers. This is one of the grounds why the specializer hearer charge higher audit fees because of their ability to extenuate and constraint gaining direction activities better than non-specialist hearers ( Krishnan, 2003 ) .

3.0 CROSS COUNTRY STUDY ON AUDIT QUALITY AND EARNING MANAGEMENT3.1 EuropeThe survey done by Tendeloo B.V. and Vanstraelen A. , 2005 shows the relationship between gaining direction and audit quality in regard of grounds from the private section market. The states involved in this survey are Belgium, Finland, France, Netherlands, Spain, Germany and the United Kingdom. The companies used in this survey included This state had been taking by Tendeloo B.

V. and Vanstraelen A, 2005 is based on to the handiness of fiscal informations and audit house informations. However, the major concern in this survey focuses on three states which are UK, France and Germany.

Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, ( 2006 ) reported that descriptive statistics on the magnitude of unnatural working capital accumulations in France, Germany and the UK. The consequence suggests that the magnitude of net incomes direction is the highest in Germany, followed by the UK and France.

This is based on the stringency of audit quality government in that state.The consequence from this survey by Tendeloo B.V. and Vanstraelen A. , 2005 divided into two classs which is single net incomes direction steps and aggregate net incomes direction step for the different industry-country groups. The consequence shows that industry groups with a Big 4 hearer have a lower aggregative net incomes direction step compared to non-Big 4 hearers. Means that companies with Large 4 hearers less involved in gaining direction comparison to those companies with non-Big 4 hearers. Similar consequence goes to the person earning direction where Tendeloo B.

V. and Vanstraelen A. , 2005 observe that there are a similar form for the net incomes smoothing steps and one net incomes discretion step. This consequence is consistent to the old determination by Johl. et.al. ( 2007 ) , Krishnan, 2003 and Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.

A, ( 2006 ) where most of the Big 4 hearers are associated with a significantly lower absolute value of unnatural working capital accumulations compared with non-Big 4 hearers, and besides with a significantly lower magnitude of income-increasing and income-decreasing net incomes direction compared with non-Big 4 hearers. This once more will reflect the audit quality performed by Large 4 hearers and their ability to constraint gaining direction activities. The ranking of the most important audit quality different in Europe states goes to UK followed by Germany which the audit quality difference is less important and the differences between Large 4 and non-Big 4 hearers are smaller. However, in Frances, there are no important differences between Large 4 and non-Big 4 hearers ( Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, 2006 ) .

Besides that, Tendeloo B.V. and Vanstraelen A. , 2005 besides examine on gaining direction steps in the position of audit quality, legal protection and investor orientation. All net incomes direction steps seem to be significantly interrelated with each other.

For audit quality is significantly negatively correlated with sum gaining direction and net incomes smoothing but is non significantly correlated with net incomes discretion step. This is besides had been revealed by Hirst ( 1994 ) where the direction ability to do discretional accumulation is limited. However, the consequence in reflect to the audit quality with the legal protection shows that the companies abode in states with strong legal protection and hapless investor orientation has important to restrain earning direction activities.

This has been supported by ( Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, 2006 ) where it found that the strong audit quality difference in the UK could be explained by the fact that the UK has a much stronger investor protection environment compared to France and Germany. As a consequence Big 4 audit house conservativism appears to be present merely in the UK, and non in France and Germany.In contrast, the consequence is non important for companies domiciled in states with weak legal protection and a strong investor orientation. In general, Large 4 hearers do non give the feeling to enforce a stronger restraint on net incomes discretion compared to non-Big 4 hearers, while companies in states with a strong legal protection prosecute significantly less in net incomes direction. In the same manner, companies with a Big 4 hearer has a important restraint on net incomes direction if there had legal protection while this restraint is non important for companies with a non-Big 4 hearer.

On the other manus, for companies with a non-Big 4 hearer shows a important restraint on net incomes direction if there are investor orientation while this restraint is non important for companies with a Big 4 hearer. Hence, while audit quality and legal protection look to be complement, audit quality and investor orientation seem replacements.Furthermore, Tendeloo B.V. and Vanstraelen A. , 2005 besides conducted sensitiveness analysis where they found that when utilizing the aggregative net incomes direction step and net incomes discretion as dependent variable, audit quality distinction is enhanced in states with a high revenue enhancement alliance.

Comparing with states with a low revenue enhancement alliance, the consequence shows private companies with a Large 4 ( non-Big 4 ) hearer engage significantly less ( more ) in net incomes direction activities.From here we can see that there are important differences in the grade of net incomes direction across states ( Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, 2006 ) where companies in the UK and France involved significantly less in net incomes direction compared to Germany. This could be due to a stricter audit environment in UK and France which can cut down on norm the extent to which companies engage in net incomes direction.3.2 MalayaA survey conducted by Johl. et.

al. ( 2007 ) examined that high degrees of absolute unnatural accumulations and gaining direction activities is associated with the audit sentiment and audit quality. In Malaysia position, Johl. et.al. ( 2007 ) argued that Malayan companies provide a puting “ less crystalline with low degrees of public enquiry ” compared to the West.

This could be due to the inclination of hearers to publish a qualified audit sentiment when gaining direction is non constrained. Hasnan. S, Abdul R, and Mahenthiran ( 2000 ) revealed that Malaysia was among the top 10 states that falls under the class of most net incomes aggressive group and one of the three East Asiatic states ( i.e.

Malaysia, Hong Kong, and Singapore ) have by far the worst net incomes direction evaluations compared to other states.In Malaysia, the non-Big 5 ( now Big 4 ) audit a similar proportion of listed companies to that featured in some US surveies where with regard to the market for audit services in Malaysia in 1998, most of private companies were audited by the Big 5 ( now Big 4 ) companies ( Johl. et.al. 2007 ) .

Auditor quality has important impact toward the fiscal statement coverage as the hearer will measure up the study. There were three signifiers of qualified sentiment in Malaysia – “ except for ” ; adverse ; and disclaimer sentiments ( Johl. et.al. 2007, p.14 ) .

These types of qualified sentiment being raised depending on the material misstatement in respects to the restriction of range of the audit ; dissension with direction sing the fiscal study ( including built-in uncertainness non adequately disclosed ) ; and a restriction on the range of the audit ( ISA 700 [ 4 ] ) , severally ( Johl. et.al.

2007, p.14 ) .Compared to other hearers, Big 5 ( now Big 4 ) or known as industry specializer hearers is expected to often publish qualified audit sentiments as the degree of inexcusably high-abnormal accumulations increases ceteris paribus ( Johl. et.al. 2007 ) . The determination on the audit quality presented by Johl.

et.al. 2007 are being classs into three stage sing fiscal crisis 1997 ; pre-crisis, crisis and post-crisis. This is because in Malaysia, the Numberss of deceitful fiscal coverage instances reported increased over the period of the fiscal crisis in 1997-1998 ( Hasnan. S. et, al, 2000 ) . During pre-crisis, there are lower per centum of sentiments issued are qualified comparing to the higher qualified sentiment on post-crisis and during crisis. This type of sentiment is greater than the inauspicious or disclaimer type sentiment as per expected.

On the other manus, audit quality differences between Large 5 ( now Big 4 ) and non-Big 5 ( now Big 4 ) companies besides show different audit sentiment. Most of the Big 5 ( now Big 4 ) client received qualified sentiments more often than non-Big 5 clients. However, during crisis and station fiscal crisis 1998, the issues highlighted on unqualified sentiments are often being rises.In regard to the earning direction, the consequences prove that absolute unnatural accumulations for observations having a qualified sentiment are being higher than for those with unqualified sentiments during pre-crisis ( Johl. et.

al. 2007 ) . However, the determination station and crisis periods seem to bespeak that qualified sentiments issued are mostly associated with negative unnatural accumulations bespeaking possible “ big-bath ” activity that is most likely due to fiscal hurt or public presentation related.With respects to scrutinize quality, most of the Big 4 performed high audit quality where they inside informations in carry oning audit undertakings. Malaya companies result are similar to the old surveies which the companies who used serviced from the Big 5 ( now Big 4 ) are received qualified sentiment and less contribute in gaining direction activities ( Johl. et.al. 2007, Tendeloo B.

V. and Vanstraelen A. , 2005 and Krishnan, 2003 ) . On the other manus, companies with little from or non-Big 5 will possibilities to have unqualified sentiment and have higher potency to make unnatural accumulations which straight contributed to gaining direction activities. The findings indicate a differential degree of audit quality displayed by hearers contingent on hearer size.Furthermore, politically linked companies in Malaysia besides have important part towards the audit quality. In general, politically linked companies receive frequent qualified audit sentiment and study less than non-politically linked companies. This could due to the ability of the directors of politically linked companies in avoiding a making due to their political influence during the auditor-client interaction/negotiation.

This will take to higher possibilities of gaining direction activities but being able to be hidden from the public cognition. Therefore, the hearers unable to supply truth judgements and has troubles to extenuate the earning direction activities due to political influence and force per unit area.Similar happening with UK, in Malaysia the hearer conservativism principle may besides be in topographic point due to the possibility of heightened judicial proceeding hazard post-crisis ( Maijoor S.J and Vanstraelen.A, 2006, and Johl. et.

al. 2007 ) . Consequently, there are significantly interaction between sentiment and Large 5 ( now Big 4 ) which indicates a greater degree of hearer conservativism observed. This is implies a differential degree of audit qualify exhibited by top-tier hearers. ( Johl. et.al. 2007, p.

21 ) .Although many surveies reported that top-tier hearers performed high audit quality, nevertheless in Malaysia, it found that some hearers appear more willing to digest and accept mistakes and disagreements in note signifier revelations than in accepted Numberss on the primary fiscal statements ( Carlin et al, 2008 ) . Failure to follow with even the most basic elements of fiscal statement will showing hapless quality conformity by the hearers and it will promote the potency of any unethical act by both parties either hearers every bit good as the their clients itself.

Therefore, hearers show less sensitive on client ‘s purpose towards gaining direction activities ( Hirst, 2004 ) .TaiwanA survey conducted by Chen K.Y et Al, ( 2005 ) is discoursing the relationship between audit quality and gaining direction in regard of IPO procedure. Harmonizing to Chen K.Y et Al, ( 2005 ) , there are some important difference between Taiwan ‘s processs in registering IPO procedure and ordinance different with respects to the audited fiscal coverage compared to comparing to US processs. One the differences are during the procedure of subscribing the hearer ‘s study. In Taiwan, hearer ‘s study demand to be signed by two audit spouses while merely one signature required as representative of audit houses in US ( Chen K.Y et Al, 2005 ) .

There are several grounds that will reflect the earning direction in the IPO procedure which includes the direction of the company may increase the earning during IPO procedure which to guarantee addition in monetary value in order to derive greater proceed that would increase company ‘s repute. Besides, the other ground is IPO houses are being allowed by Accounting Principles Board ( APB 20 ) to alter accounting rules in the prospectus every bit long as fiscal statements of old old ages are restated. This may offer direction opportunities to prosecute in net incomes direction activities ( Chen K.Y et Al, 2005 ) .

In the regard of audit quality and gaining direction, likewise to prior determination, consequence shows that high audit quality is associated with the earning direction pattern in Taiwan ‘s companies. “ In Taiwan, the large five audit houses are T.N. Soong & A ; Co. ( member of Arthur Andersen ) , PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, Deloitte and Touche, and Diwan Ernst & A ; Young. Due to the Enron dirt and ceased operation of Andersen on August 31, 2002, T.N.

Soong & A ; Co. merged into Deloitte and Touche and became Deloitte and Touche on June 1, 2003. The clients of T.

N. Soong were besides transferred to Deloitte and Touche, which is different from the state of affairs in the US, where Andersen ‘s clients chose other large five or non-big five audit houses as replacement hearers ” ( Chen K.Y et Al, 2005, p. 5 ) .

From here we can see that the amalgamation of the audit house will reflect to the client ‘s pick of their hearers. Therefore, similar to others state, in Taiwan, Big 5 ( now 4 ) hearer are known as high quality hearer while non-Big 4 hearers, particularly for those local audit houses are often recognized as lower quality hearers. These have been proved where most of the clients choose Large 4 companies in the IPO procedure ( Chen K.Y et Al, 2005 ) . This bookman suggested that during IPO process many of Taiwan ‘s company tend to pattern gaining direction where they are seeking to increase the portion monetary value by pull stringsing gaining figures.

Increase in the monetary value of the portion is associated with the information provided by that company and it is besides important with the house ‘s size every bit good where this bookman informed that big houses employ more in income increasing net incomes direction in the IPO procedure. However, Chen K.Y et Al, 2005 added that the successful of gaining direction pattern in these companies is depends on whether the market can detect through the net incomes use. Furthermore, companies with non-Big 4 hearers tend to prosecute to smooth earning activities where they will pull strings the history by greater income-increasing ( diminishing ) unexpected accumulations. For IPO houses unexpected accumulations is lower if used services from large 4 hearers and it will possibly extenuate gaining discretions by direction. Therefore, we can reason that the size of hearer has signification impact with lower unexpected accumulations, changeless with the ability of restraining net incomes direction and supplying more accurate information by the high quality hearers.In the other manus, by looking at the industry specializer hearers, the IPO companies in Taiwan did non good recognized the industry specialisation as the of import component of audit quality. It is could be due to the status where Taiwan ‘s audit market is smaller than US.

Even though the industry specializer hearers did non good recognized, but there are important different between industry specializers for Large 4 clients and non-Big 4 clients where merely Large 4 client ‘s do extremely recognized industry specializer. It is because in the IPO procedure in Taiwan, this industry specializer hearer is more likely to observe and restrain net incomes direction.DecisionBased on these three states, we can see that there are similarities result show in the relationship between gaining direction and audit quality. In term of restraining gaining direction activities, the survey on these three states agreed that the Big 4 companies will be able to extenuate and cut down gaining direction compared to non Big 4 companies. In the regard of specialize industry hearers, most of the Big 4 promote themselves as specialize expert where they are required to execute elaborate audit undertaking in order to measure up audit study beside restraining gaining direction.

Beside, as per discussed in Europe instances, if the states have strong legal protection, the survey suggested that the battle in the earning direction activities in lesser. On the other manus, in Taiwan, it shows that the specialize industry hearer does non play important part to gaining direction activities as Taiwan audit environment is smaller than others states particularly UK. However, the survey conducted in Malaya shows that, the hearers besides may sometimes tolerate and accept mistakes done by the directors in the client company.

By making this, it will promote the earning direction pattern. Therefore, farther survey can be conducted in mensurating the relationship of the audit quality and the earning direction in different positions where may be will look at on the hearers engagement or part toward gaining direction patterns.


I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out