Difference Between Infectious Prion Proteins Biology Essay

The aim of the research reported by Pan et. Al. in the article “ Conversion of I±-helices into I?-sheets characteristics in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins ” is to analyse whether the difference between infective prion proteins ( PrPSc in the instance of scrapie ) and the normal cellular prions ( PrPC ) is related to a difference in the conformation of these proteins: the ratio between the sum of I±-helices and the sum of I?-sheets. Previous research on prions showed that PrPSc is synthesized post-translationally from PrPC, but no procedure affecting a chemical alteration has been discovered, taking to the hypothesis of a conformational alteration that would bring forth the PrPSc: the transition of I±-helices into I?-sheets ; this conformational difference hypothesis has been farther supported by by experimentation ascertained differences in belongingss between the two proteins: solubility in detergents, peptidase hydrolysis, accretion, and others. In add-on, research has shown the PrPSc has a protease-resistant nucleus designated PrP 27-30 which has been discovered to hold a preponderantly LF ( low frequence ) I?-sheet construction, characteristic of amyloids ( prion protein sums associated with neurodegenerative upsets ) .

In order to prove the hypothesis of the transition of I±-helices into I?-sheets, the scientists devised an experimental process in which they isolated both PrPC and PrPSc ( PrPSc was by experimentation produced inside the tissue ) from the encephalons of Syrian hamsters. The PrPC was purified through a process that avoided utilizing low pH, urea or SDS/PAGE, all of which could denature the proteins. The purification process used for this experiment merely employed zwittergent 3-12 ( ZW ) , centrifugation, IMAC-CU2+ , IMAC-Co2+ and wheat sources agglutinin ( WGA ) columns, and solutions incorporating buffer, Na chloride, Na phosphate and iminazole, used for rinsing the columns ( all of the solutions were used in concentrations that would non interfere with the protein construction ) . PrPSc and PrP 27-30 were purified utilizing processs reported in other research articles, and were finally centrifuged and washed with PBSZ and PBSZ/H2O solutions.The three proteins ( PrPC, PrPSc, and PrP 27-30 ) were so subjected to assorted analytical techniques in order to compare them. The proteins were foremost denatured by boiling in buffer and their amino acid sequences were determined, for a anticipation of the protein secondary construction: the analysis was foremost done by SDS/PAGE, followed by Ag staining visual image, and were eventually stained with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate ( BCIP ) and with nitro bluish tetrazolium ( NBT ) , for amino acid analysis. Following, the FTIR ( Fourier Transform Infrared ) spectrum was recorded for all three proteins, followed by the Cadmium ( round dichroism ) of merely PrPC. These spectra were necessary in order to acquire the exact secondary construction ) .

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

For a ocular analysis of the collection province ( formless or starchlike sums ) of the three proteins, electron micrographs were obtained by utilizing gilded atom conjugated caprine animal antibody attached to the mouse IgG.Before any of the antecedently listed analyses, the research workers foremost made certain that the purification method for PrPC was successful: both the lectin chromatography and the SDS/PAGE consequences showed that the 2nd pool of fractions obtained from the purification procedures merely contained the coveted proteins, with a mass of 33-35 kDa. The amide I ‘ set FTIR spectrum of PrPC showed a extremum at 1653 cm-1 ( characteristic of high I±-helix content ) , while the spectra for PrPSc and PrP 27-30 were characteristic of a high I?-sheet content.

Upon deconvolution of the spectra, it was calculated thet PrPC had merely 3 % I?-sheet content, while PrPSc and PrP 27-30 had a I?-sheet content of 43 % and 54 % , severally.The informations obtained from the FTIR spectrum of PrPC were confirmed by obtaining and analysing the Cadmium spectrum of this protein: the Cadmium consequences were in close understanding with the FTIR 1s. Cadmium could non be performed for the other two proteins because they were non soluble.

Class-dependent ( I±/ I± , I±/I? , I?/ I? ) and naA?ve secondary construction anticipations were performed and the four I±-helices showed both strong spiral penchant in the I±/ I± category and a strong I?-sheet penchant in the I?/ I? category: this supports the hypothesis of the transition of I±-helices into I?-sheets. Finally, the negatron micrographs obtained showed that PrPC and PrPSc appeared as formless, while PrP 27-30 polymers formed a bacillar amyloid.Form the consequences reported in the paper, the research workers concluded that the formation and extension of PrPSc from the normal protein PrPC chiefly involves the transition of I±-helices into I?-sheets, but no decisions can be drawn as to whether this procedure is triggered by some sort of chemical alteration in some of the PrPC molecules, or by some other type of event. All old findings do non state anything about the cause for the transition, butpoint toward the fact that prion diseases are caused merely by the PrPC to PrPSc transition, and toward the fact that this transition is the chief event that leads to prion diseases. In add-on, past articles have proven that the conformational alteration can be triggered by the presence of a individual PrPSc molecule. Previous findings have besides shown that this conformational alteration is a really complex procedure which requires extra proteins ( other than PrPC ) , which would catalyse the alteration, moving likewise to chaperones. Some research workers even suggested that of PrPSc formation might affect starchlike formation as its cardinal constituent, but this thought is disproved in the present article by Pan et.

al. , which shows that the PrPSc is present as an formless sum and non as an amyloid. The findings from this article, along with all the old findings mentioned here, raise a batch of inquiries, but at the same clip unfastened new doors toward a better apprehension of prion diseases.

Critical Reappraisal:

In my sentiment, the full experiment was really good conducted and all the processs ( from sublimating the three proteins to executing FTIR spectroscopy, round dichroism and negatron microscopy on them ) were really good chosen so that they would supply the information necessary to verify the hypothesis, and besides, to forestall the denaturing of the proteins. The experiments followed a logical sequence, get downing with the production of the proteins inside the mice encephalons, followed by the extraction and purification of the proteins, and stoping with the analysis of the secondary construction of each of the three proteins and the reading of the experimental consequences.Even though the experimental process was really good constructed and the research provided some really of import replies sing the procedure of infective prion formation, there were a few minor defects throughout the paper. First of wholly, the research workers discuss the FTIR of PrP 27-30 in the debut, stipulating the old findings along with the fact that two tierces of the I?-sheets were low-frequency ( characteristic of amyloids ) , but do n’t make the LF analysis themelves. Since this type of analysis was specified in the debut as antecedently being performed, it would hold made a batch of sense to execute the LF analysis for all three proteins in order to happen the LF I?-sheet per centum ( could hold uncovered some new information ) and at the same clip, verify the truth of the experiment against the past experiment.

Second, this experiment seems to be composed of a really boring purification process, followed by a comparatively simple analysis of the three proteins which merely returns the sums of I±-helices and I?-sheets. A better manner to near prion diseases would be to clarify the constructions of the three proteins ( utilizing methods like X-ray crystallography or atomic magnetic resonance ) . Then, by comparing these constructions to one another, one can detect precisely where the conformational passages occur and what amino acids are involved in these passages, which might finally take to an apprehension of prion diseases.Third, the research workers talk about non being able to obtain CD spectra for PrPSc and PrP 27-30 ( because of unsolvability of these proteins ) , but say that some Cadmium spectra have been obtained ( with the proteins deposited as thin movies ) . However, the research workers do non speak about these consequences and do non compare them to the FTIR consequences that they obtained.

This Cadmium vs. FTIR coprison was done in the instance of PrPC, but was omitted for the other two proteins, taking one to inquire why the research workers decided to exclude these consequences.Last, the treatment subdivision of the paper did non construe the experimental consequences in great item, which is likely because the decision was really clear and did non necessitate excessively much explaining: the hypothesis was proven right with no other extra findings.

However, the research workers chose to show a great sum of old findings on the topic of prions and prion diseases, but they forgot to give the ground for showing all of that information: there was hardly any connexion with their experiment and no ground was given as to why that information should be utile, particularly in correlativity with the experiment presented in the article.In decision, this experiment is really good built, but it contains excessively small experimental informations sing the magnitude of the biomolecular events that the research workers are seeking to analyze. It is clear that the research workers merely searched to prove the short, preexistent hypothesis of conformational passages without any effort to province an original hypothesis and seek to detect something new.

Performing more complex experiments to seek to at least clarify the construction of the proteins and analyse the amino acid interactions that lead to the formation of prions would supply the evidences for a much more in-depth decision, bring forthing a high-quality research article which could open the way toward work outing the job of prion diseases.

x

Hi!
I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out