Criminal Justice System Essay Sample

In this paper the subject is to discourse the peripheral of the Criminal Justice system and its functions.

This paper will besides explicate the procedure of the Criminal Justice System. In add-on. it will give a brief description of offense.

its relationship to the jurisprudence and the theoretical accounts of how society determines its Acts of the Apostless.Crime and its relationship to the jurisprudenceThe definition of offense is a certain person who commits a unlawful discourtesy that is against the jurisprudence. Crime is sometimes labeled as unenforced and can ensue in offenses and unlawful behaviors. . Crimes are determined to be discourtesies that is done incorrect to the populace or province.

The relationship between offense and the jurisprudence is without Torahs offenses can non be enforced and hence. society will take affairs into their ain custodies. Without Torahs the society will non be safe and hence.

can non protect the inexperienced person from sing victimization ( Schmallager. 2011 ) .
Components of the Criminal Justice SystemIn society today there are two common Torahs that allow society to map and decide which Acts of the Apostless are considered condemnable. Those Two Torahs are known as the Consensus Model and the struggle theoretical account.

The Consensus theoretical accounts concludes that the Criminal Justice system works together to make an accomplishment known as Justice. However. the struggle theoretical account concludes that the Criminal Justice systems chief intent is to function their ain involvements ( Schmalleger. 2011 ) . The condemnable Justice system is composed of three subdivisions. Those subdivisions consist of Police or jurisprudence enforcement bureaus. tribunals and corrections.

Each constituent maps to follow. Police are the people who investigate and make the apprehensions. Their chief intent is to maintain the streets and people in society safe from offense. The 2nd system is the tribunals. The tribunals are used to settle differences and found inexperienced person or guilty. The chief intent of the tribunals is to make up one’s mind if an person is guiltless or guilty.

The concluding measure is the corrections. The corrections forms the penalty of the felon. some include pecuniary. house apprehension. and even probation. The chief intent of the corrections is to maintain the wrongdoer from perpetrating another offense ( Schmallager.

2011 ) .The Government Structures in the Criminal Justice systemThe Criminal Justice System consists of bureaus at the federal. province. and local degree. These subdivisions are the legislative subdivision. the judicial subdivision.

and the executive subdivision. The Legislative subdivision provides support for the condemnable justness bureaus. The Judicial subdivision makes the judgements and pronounces the guilt of individuals charged with offenses. The 3rd subdivision. which is the executive subdivision. gives the power to implement Torahs ( Criminal Justice Information & A ; Support. 2013 ) .
The Criminal Justice ProcessThere are many stairss to the Criminal Justice Process get downing with an probe.

To get down an probe means jurisprudence enforcement members to happen grounds of a offense or instance and turn out that their suspect or convicted suspect has committed the offense. The 2nd measure is to do an apprehension and take the person into detention where they are subsequently ask inquiries about the offense committed and so they are provided with a tribunal day of the month. Once they are provided with a tribunal day of the month they are taken in for engagement. During this procedure personal information is taken and inserted into the computing machine systems. Miranda Rights are so read to he or she before they are placed in a keeping cell.

Then there is visual aspect for their following tribunal day of the month. During their visual aspect to the tribunal the justice who is sing their instance will supply them with the charges that are against them. the justice will besides remind them of their rights and depending on how bad their offense is he or she may supply them with the chance for bond. Besides during their first visual aspect they will be provided a attorney if he or she can non afford one or does non hold one. ( Smalleger. 2011 ) .
The following procedure of the Criminal Justice procedure is the preliminary hearing. The intent for a preliminary hearing is to make up one’s mind whether or non the grounds of the instance is good plenty to travel to test.

In a preliminary hearing a justice will make up one’s mind if a offense has been committed is truly stated as a offense. Depending on how strong the grounds is. he or she may propose a supplication deal to be arranged.

In some provinces the prosecuting officer may go on the instance against a suspect by registering “information” with the tribunal. Information that is filed is on a footing of the result of the preliminary hearing. Some provinces require an indictment be returned by a expansive jury before the prosecution can travel on. The expansive jury so hears the grounds from the prosecuting officer and decides whether the instance is traveling to test. Arraignment is the following measure in the procedure. At the arraignment the accused victim will stand in forepart of a justice and hear the information that is against him or her as it reads. The suspect is so asked if they are guilty. non guilty.

or no competition. If the suspect is guilty the justice will condemn a penalty ( Criminal Justice Information & A ; Support. 2013 ) .Goals of the Criminal Justice SystemThe ends of the Criminal Justice system are to keep order. penalize the guilty.

and take menaces from society. Given of artlessness Begins with assuming that the suspect is guiltless until proved guilty. Then there is due procedure which is related to the given of artlessness. Due Process involves a complete scrutiny of each instance. Independent judiciary provinces that anyone who is accused of a offense can take to hold their instance seen by jury members who will supply them with a just and honorable test. Openness and handiness is another measure that is a end to the Criminal Justice System. It states that merely the populace can give information about how they feel about the populace.

Equality before jurisprudence is the last end of the condemnable Justice system. it states that people in Canada besides be given a just and impartial test ( Criminal Justice Information & A ; Support. 2013 ) .

DecisionThe aim of this paper is to demo how the Criminal Justice system tallies and how the Torahs are applied. In add-on. it shows how the relationship of offense is created to the jurisprudence. Besides it describes theconstituents of the Criminal Justice system.

Plants CitedCriminal Justice Information and Support. ( 2012 ) .

Retrieved from World Wide Web. justicebc. caF.

schmallager. 2011 Criminal Justice Today ( 11th ed. ) Upper Saddle River. NJ Pearson/Prentice Hall