Iycee Charles de Gaulle Summary Commentary On Essay

Commentary On Essay

“ Bartleby The Scrivner ” Essay, Research Paper

The character of the storyteller might be identified as a instead egoistic

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

adult male who would instead & # 8216 ; prefer non to & # 8217 ; undergo a confrontation with any of his

employees. This is apparent in his decriptions of the employees and his alleged

good purposes when he sets himself as a tolerant, contributing adult male. It is obvious

that his purposes and actions are merely for his ain ego involvement and his

desiring to be thought of as assisting those who are non every bit fortunate as he. All

along what he hopes to accomplish with his charity is to assist sooth his ain vision

by bettering the physical province of others. His turning away of confrontation is

rather apparent when he really moves out of his office alternatively of holding

Bartleby physically removed by the governments. His character is tested with

Bartleby & # 8217 ; s passive-aggressive attitude though I can non hold wholly that he is

“ softened ” by his familiarity with Bartleby because in some respects

he was already soft. Bartleby is definetly cut from a stronger fabric although he

surely has his ain manner of communicating. He does non give into the Wall

Street hardness and does non make anything that does non accommodate him. He takes life

for what it is deserving & # 8230 ; nil more and nil less. Even though he literally

does non inquire for anything, he sends his message loud and clear: I will make what I

feel necessary to last and everything else, “ I would prefer non

to. ” It is slightly amusing that in the strong corporate ambiance of the

concern universe, you have a foreman that would & # 8216 ; prefer to & # 8217 ; no Oklahoman battalion it up and

acquire away from an employee than to hold to cover with him. All in all, the

storyteller is non cold and does stop up with a scruples which is apparent by his

look intoing on Bartleby both at the old office and the gaol. I think Barlteby

challenged him in a manner that he had ne’er been challenged before and quite

candidly he did non cognize precisely what to make with him. Jamie Finkelman

I find the relationship between the writer and Bartleby to be a really unusual,

unrealistic one, at least in today & # 8217 ; s society. Bartleby, an employee of the

writer, is under the bid of the writer, and is acquiring paid to make what the

writer says to make. Although Bartleby is really polite and unconfrontational when

declining to make a occupation the writer petitions, Bartleby IS declining. If he & # 8217 ; s non

making what his foreman says as refering to his occupation, he shouldn & # 8217 ; t acquire paid. The

occupation is non acquiring done. If there was a state of affairs like this that happened today

in most any workplace, I would believe that the uncompliant employee would be

terminated from his/her place that twenty-four hours. The writer nevertheless, merely allows

Bartleby to move in whatever manner he chooses even when Bartleby is making

perfectly no work whatsoever. An employer today would see this behaviour as a

harm to his billfold and would therefore waste no clip firing the employee. I,

personally, would hold fired Bartleby because he would non even give a ground as

to why he would non make anything.

Jennifer, I think the unusual relationship between

Bartleby and the employer is supposed to look

unrealistic. it makes the reader, particularly modern

1s, think precisely the manner you did in your station. The

fact that employers would non or should non set up with

this sort of insubordination is precisely true. It makes

you wonder what is it about Bartleby that makes the

employer sympathetic to his “ demands ” . The foreman seems to

understand that there is something per se incorrect

with Bartleby, an implicit in unhappiness that he can non

find the cause of, and I think he cares for him a

great trade and besides pities him every bit good. This is why he

does non fire him or take utmost steps until he

perfectly has to.

Jen, I see what you mean about Bartleby? s relationship with the writer. It

does look really unusual. I got the same feeling. I besides found it weird that

Bartleby was declining to make the occupations that the writer asked him to make. You? re

right though he truly is pretty considerate and respectful when denying the

fact that he has a occupation to make for his employer. This is the manner that this

process goes the employer tells the employee what to make and when to make it. The

outlandishness in the affair is that Bartleby is declining to make so. Your really right

Jen, today this type of intervention towards your employer would acquire you

terminated. I would hold to state that Bartleby has no existent regard for his

employer, but merely possibly an act. Person who would make this to their foreman would

be missing manners.

The storyteller seems to hold a job in the narrative, he is sympathetic with

Bartleby passed a sensible point. The storyteller allows Bartleby to merely decline

orders and still state employed, taking commiseration on him it seems. The storyteller besides

seems to avoid confrontation with many others excessively, to the point of movin

g out of

his office. Now he comes off as both a difficult and easy adult male, he does what is

required of him largely, except when it comes to Bartleby. In Bartleby & # 8217 ; s instance,

the storyteller is like a moisture noodle, flexing to Bartleby & # 8217 ; s caprices, even though he

should be fired. I think the storyteller perhpas was a cold adult male, but that Bartleby

allow him see a side of humanity he had antecedently, missed, and shows him the

value of people, and of emotion. The storyteller follows up on Bartleby at the old

office and gaol, demoing that he did so hold more than merely a passing


For the clients of these business communities, I think that much

good is accomplished by their work. Whether we like them

or non, attorneies are indispensable members of society.

However, the narrative is told from the point of position of a

man of affairs, so more of import is what the workers

themselves think of the concern universe. Indeed, by the

terminal of the narrative, the storyteller realizes merely what a

bleak being he leads and how he has disconnected

himself with life outside of the concern kingdom.

Unfortunately, after witnessing the ruin of

Bartleby, I think that the storyteller reaches the point in

his life where he asks himself what the significance of his

being is.

I really found the narrative to be one of the most

gratifying plants that we have read so far. I had no thought

that Melville could be so amusing. For whatever ground,

the insisting of Bartleby in utilizing the word “ prefer ”

and his fellow employees so utilizing the word without

cognizing it, I found to be highly humourous. In my

position, the narrative has become popular for grounds other

than merely being an entertaining read and supplying a

alone position on the concern universe. I think that

many readers can place with the battles of the

characters in the narrative. In this information-driven

society, many of us are consumed with our work, meeting

deadlines, and being every bit productive as possible. Much

like the characters in the narrative, frequently times we feel

that our lives have been taken over by work.

This storyteller is really reserved. He was selectful in taking his occupations due to

his character. He wishes to non be put in a place which may go

confrontational. That is why he chose to ne’er turn to the jury. He wants to

stay discreet and by making so, he chooses to cover with mortgages, workss and

bonds. I believe his association with Bartleby has changed this storyteller.

Previously, he would hold ne’er permitted such behavior in his employee when

asked to due a peculiar undertaking. He is a cautious single whose method is to

believe things out exhaustively before acquiring involved. Normally, he would non hold

gotten involved with helping Bartleby as he had attempted to make numerously.

Yet, he has grown respectful of Bartleby & # 8217 ; s steadfast ways and continued his

efforts. The significance of the scene of the narrative is a cryptic 1. The

names of the employees are non revealed nor is the figure of the location. This

leads me to believe that possibly this state of affairs really occurred and being as

discreet as this storyteller is, he doesn & # 8217 ; t uncover excessively much. This is a sarcasm in

the concern universe because such behavior would non be tolerated. If employees

were to incessively “ instead non ” finish a undertaking assigned by their

supervisor, they would be terminated. Furthermore, it is non permissable for

employees to shack in their topographic point of employment.

The storyteller does good depicting himself in the narrative. If you follow closely

he gives you many inside informations which give you an unsloped description of ego. He

calls himself, ? an umambitious attorney & # 8230 ; & # 8230 ; with a profound strong belief that

the easiest manner of life is the best. ? Others consider him an? eminently safe

adult male? who seldom loses his pique. He is a conveyer and rubric huntsman with an

office on Wall Street. He has a batch of compassion ( possibly non for society as a

whole ) for Bartleby. I do non experience that the storyteller genuinely? changed? by his

association with Bartleby, but instead he changed merely when he was around

Bartleby. It is hard to state, sing the storyteller does non offer any

experiences other than those which Bartleby is associated, but I will state that

the storyteller has made no lasting alteration in his life. The scene of the narrative

is important because Wall Street is comprised of all concerns, which means

that? every dark of mundane it is in emptiness. ? Bartleby is content with

being secluded at that place. The scene is besides important sing the satirical

intension of the concern universe. Bartleby is an interloper at that place, non because he

will non go forth, but because he is rejects all facets of concern. And the fact

that he is content on being at that place, gazing out the window, without imparting the

slightest of his custodies to work, shows how much he dislikes it.