Academia and Text Matching Software Essay

Critically measure the usage of text fiting package as an assistance to developing good scholarship pattern Introduction Academic dishonesty such as plagiarism has been a major factor in instruction that has affected students’ success and academic accomplishments in recent old ages. Plagiarism harmonizing to Park ( 2003 ) is the act of allowing or copying another person’s work and go throughing them on as one’s thought without admiting the original beginning. Park ( 2003 ) noted that plagiarism is a turning job and has been a abuse of the Hagiographas of another writer. their thoughts.

hypothesis. theories. research findings and readings.Furthermore surveies by Chao. Wilhelm and Neureuther ( 2009 ) emphasised that the lifting tendency of plagiarism among pupils can be attributed to several factors such as academic literacy. linguistic communication competency and the technological promotions in the universe today in footings of high velocity cyberspace installation available in inns and computing machine labs.

These factors harmonizing to Chao. Wilhelm and Neureuther ( 2009 ) has enhanced the ability of pupils to plagiarize a whole assignment by obtaining documents on the cyberspace associating to their assignments which is every bit easy as copying and pasting.Park ( 2003 ) stated that pupils have different perceptual experiences towards plagiarism.

He noted that pupils view plagiarism as a minor offense which is different from rip offing in test. He farther discovered that plagiarism could be unwilled ( ibid ) . This is because some pupils possess a mental semblance in which they believe they have produced something from their ain position while infact they are reproducing something which they have read from another writer. The intent of this paper is to critically measure the consequence of text fiting package as an assistance to developing good scholarship pattern.This paper will get down by briefly depicting what good scholarship practise is. In add-on the usage of text matching package for observing good scholarship pattern will be critically discussed and a decision will be made based on the rating. Good scholarship pattern can be referred to as a formal survey which involves academic acquisition and accomplishment. It involves admiting where information used to back up thoughts in a peculiar context is gotten and mentioning the beginnings ( Locke and Latham.

2009 ) .Britag and Mahmud ( 2009 ) pointed out that different schemes whichinclude the usage of electronic package tools such as turnitin have been derived for observing plagiarism with the purpose of leting students’ take duty of their acquisition and besides work manus in manus with their coachs in the drafting phases of their assignments. Harmonizing to Britag and Mahmud ( 2009 ) manual sensing of plagiarism is hard because it is clip devouring and this is the ground why some coachs are loath in prosecuting possible instances of plagiarism.However both the manual method of plagiarism sensing and the electronic text fiting method should be employed ( Britag and Mahmud. 2009 ) .

Scaife ( 2007 ) argued that the electronic text matching package is non the solution to extinguishing plagiarism because the package merely focuses on text matching of paper under reappraisal with paperss ( diaries. articles. e-books and conference documents ) found on the cyberspace or which has been antecedently submitted and this is a restriction because the lone sensing are focused on electronic stuffs without sing some non-electronic paper based paperss which could still be plagiarised.Walker ( 2010 ) stated that with the development of text fiting package such as the turnitin plagiarism sensing was made easier. nevertheless he emphasised that the turnitin sensing package is non 100 per cent efficient. it simply identifies and lucifers stuffs present in a papers uploaded to turnitin website to stuffs available on the cyberspace. Walker ( 2010 ) describes the electronic text fiting package as a tool merely suited for observing word for word or direct plagiarism in electronic signifier and the refined 1s from the paper based beginnings are non easy detected.Furthermore Carroll and Appleton ( 2001 ) argued that the turnitin is merely an option for mensurating plagiarism and that entirely can non be used as a footing for judging good scholarship pattern.

In add-on Carroll and Appleton ( 2001 ) insist that the usage of electronic package for observing plagiarism requires human application and reading and that utilizing turnitin entirely as a medium for plagiarism sensing is non adept.Harmonizing to Barrett and Malcolm ( 2006 ) the electronic text fiting package ( turnitin ) merely indicates possible plagiarism without any certainty. it is left to the coach to find the extent to which the author has plagiarised or included some beginnings in the paper without admiting where they were acquired. In decision the construct of plagiarism can non be overemphasised.It has become a factor that has affected good academic scholarship pattern and has created an avenue for pedagogues to develop methods for observing and covering with plagiarism.

The development of the electronic sensing package such as the turnitin has enhanced the sensing of plagiarism nevertheless it can non be relied upon wholly because it is non effectual. In add-on it is of import to understand that the best manner to observe plagiarism is to utilize both the manual method which involves pedagogues and the usage of electronic text fiting package such as turnitin.Students could besides be assisted in understanding the standards for academic authorship such as the codification of behaviors which requires them to admit any beginning from where information is derived when composing academically. Mentions Barrett.

R. & A ; Malcolm. J. ( 2006 ) ‘Embedding plagiarism instruction in the appraisal process’ . International Journal for Educational Integrity. Vol.

2. No. 1. pp. 38-45. Bretag. T.

and Mahmud. S. ( 2009 ) ‘A theoretical account for finding pupil plagiarism: Electronic sensing and academic opinion.‘ . Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

Vol. 6. No. 1.

pp. 50-60. Chao. C. . Wilhelm.

W. J. . Neureuther. B. D. ( 2009.

) ‘A Study of Electronic Detection and Pedagogical Approaches for Reducing Plagiarism’ . The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal. Vol. 51. No.

1. pp. 31-42. Carroll. J. and Appleton. J. ( 2001 ) .

Plagiarism: A good pattern usher. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University. Locke. E. A. Latham. G. P ( 2009 ) ‘Has Goal Puting Gone Wild.

or Have Its Attackers Abandoned Good Scholarship? ‘ . The Academy of Management Perspectives. Vol. 23.

No. 1. pp.

17-23. Park. C. ( 2003 ) .

‘In Other ( People’s ) Wordss: plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons’ . Assessment & A ; Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 28. No. 5. pp. 472-488.

Scaife. B ( 2007 ) IT Consultancy Plagiarism Detection Software Report for JISC Advisory Service. [ Online ] . Retrieved from: World Wide Web. plagiarismadvice.

org/documents/resources/PDReview-Reportv1_5. pdf [ Accessed 24th October 2012 ] . Walker. J. ( 2010 ) ‘Measuring plagiarism: researching what pupils do. non what they say they do’ .

Surveies in Higher Education. Vol. 35. No. 1. pp.

41-59.