A Major QTL For Rice Heading Date Biology Essay

Heading ( blooming ) day of the month is one of the most of import adaptative features of workss, which has a major impact on grain output in harvest species. In rice, photoperiod and temperature are two important exogenic signals that control heading day of the month. Extensive research on photoperiod effects has identified two important blossoming tracts. However, really small is known about temperature effects. Field observations indicate that low temperature delays the blossoming, but the molecular mechanism underlying this procedure has non yet been identified. The chief aim of this survey was to dissect the familial footing of rice blooming ordinance by temperature, apart from the photoperiod, which has been extensively researched.

Methodology/Principal Findingss

We conducted phenotypic and genotypic analysis on two Oryza sativa L. indica assortments, Zhenshan 97 and Zhongzao 18, and 168 recombinant inbred lines derived from them, grown in two different seasons in two old ages. Trials under different photoperiod and temperature conditions in growing Chamberss showed that heading day of the month ( HD ) of both parents was accelerated at high temperatures but delayed at low temperatures irrespective of photoperiod. The averaged effectual cumulative temperatures ( ECTs ) necessary for Zhenshan 97 and Zhongzao 18 were fluctuated around 1110 and 1260 & A ; deg ; C, severally, either in both field and growing chamber experiments or long twenty-four hours and short twenty-four hours conditions, bespeaking these values are parents ‘ threshold ECTs, which could be the requirement before header.


A major ECT QTL, qEHD10, besides with a big consequence on HD, was identified in the interval between markers RM1375 and RM3229 on chromosome 10, which could explicate 42.2 % to 57.0 % of ECT fluctuation and 39.8 % to 59.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

4 % of HD fluctuation in four environments. Over all these fresh findings would better the cognition of temperature effects on rice blossoming.


Blooming clip is one of the most cardinal and of import adaptative features of workss, which transit from the vegetative to reproductive phase mediated by endogenous and exogenic signals.

Endogenous signals include gibberellin and ascorbic acid, which play a important function in blooming. Endogenous signals are non mostly influenced by environment [ 1 ] . The two major exogenic signals that chiefly influence this passage are photoperiod and temperature [ 2 ] .

Based on the photoperiod demands for blossoming, workss are divided into short-day workss, long-day workss, and day-neutral workss [ 3 ] , [ 4 ] . Because rice is a short twenty-four hours works, heading day of the month ( HD ) is accelerated under short-day ( SD ) conditions while it is delayed under long-day ( LD ) conditions.Photoperiodic controlled tracts have been good described utilizing mutations and natural assortments in Arabidopsis and rice. Blooming in Arabidopsis is stimulated under LD conditions and activates the FLOWERING LOCUS T ( FT ) [ 5 ] , which conceals a nomadic florigen [ 6 ] . FT look is activated by CONSTANS ( CO ) , which consists of a Zn finger sphere and a CCT sphere [ 7 ] and is in bend regulated by GIGANTEA ( GI ) , a portion of the circadian clock [ 8 ] .Mean while many cistrons responsible for photoperiodic blossoming in rice, such as Hd1, Ehd1, EHD2, SE5, Ghd7, and Hd3a have been identified. Hd1, an orthologue of CO in Arabidopsis, has double maps in commanding rice header, functioning as a booster of heading under SD conditions and a represser under LD conditions.

Plants that lack a functional Hd1 cistron flower subsequently under SD conditions compared with wild-type workss, which indicate the important function of Hd1 in advancing blooming under SD conditions [ 9 ] , [ 10 ] . Another QTL for blossoming, Early header day of the month 1 ( Ehd1 ) , which encodes a B-type response regulator [ 11 ] promotes blooming under both SD and LD conditions but to a greater extent under SD conditions. Under SD conditions, Ehd1 promotes look of Hd3a and a related FT-like cistron, rice FT1 [ 11 ] .

Ehd1 is thought to move independently of Hd1, and its look is up-regulated by the MADS box cistron OsMADS51 [ 12 ] , which is itself regulated by OsGI. Therefore, OsMADS51 might be moving as an intermediate between OsG1 and Ehd1 to advance the look of Ehd1 with a diurnal beat under SD conditions. In add-on, OsGI might modulate diurnal look of Hd1, similar to the ordinance of CO by GI in Arabidopsis [ 13 ] .

This shows the of import function of OsGI, like GI in Arabidopsis, in commanding the two independent photoperiodic tracts. Recently Xue et Al. [ 14 ] reported that Ghd7 encodes a Zn finger and a CCT sphere, expressed preponderantly during the light period of long yearss, and delays blooming under LD conditions by quashing Hd3a. In add-on, surveies have besides clarified that Oryza sativa INDETERMINATE1 ( OsId1, RId1, or Ehd2 ) is besides required for look of Ehd1 and Hd3a for the publicity of blooming under SD conditions [ 15 ] – [ 17 ] . However, there are no homologues of Ghd7, OsID1, Ehd1, or OsMADS51 in Arabidopsis.Temperature is another of import environmental factor involved in blooming. In Arabidopsis, the temperature-regulated vernalization tract is indispensable for blooming.

Several surveies have shown that fluctuation at one or both of two venue, FLOWERING LOCUS C ( FLC ) and FRI, can account for a big part of the winter one-year wont in Arabidopsis [ 18 ] . FLC, which encodes a MADS box written text factor, represses the flowered booster SUPPRESSOR OF OVER EXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 and besides binds to the sites within the FT cistron to quash written text and stamp down the long-day blossoming response [ 19 ] . In add-on, the vernalization mediated repression of FLC requires VERNALIZATION INSENSITIVE 3 [ 20 ] , VERNALIZATION 2, and VERNALIZATION 1, plant-specific DNA-binding proteins [ 21 ] . Lee et Al. [ 22 ] demonstrated that SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE is indispensable for delayed blooming under cool conditions utilizing svp mutations.

FT look is elevated at high growing temperatures [ 23 ] , whereas small acceleration is seen in ft mutations, demoing that that FT is involved in this phenomenon. Balasubramanian et Al. [ 24 ] reported that warmer growing conditions ( 27.8 & A ; deg ; C versus 23.8 & A ; deg ; C ) accelerated blooming under SD conditions, when CO is less active, and proposed that there might be another mechanism that induces FT in response to high temperatures.In rice, nevertheless, really small is known about temperature effects because this species does non undergo a vernalization period. Field observations indicate that low temperature delays the blossoming, but the molecular mechanism underlying this procedure has non yet been identified. No homologue of Arabidopsis FLC controlled by temperature signals has been observed in rice.

Compared to the extended work on photoperiod, small research has been conducted to clarify possible temperature effects on rice header.In this survey, we tested a recombinant inbred line ( RIL ) population and its two parents: ( 1 ) to mensurate how they respond to different temperatures and photoperiods under both natural and unreal conditions ; ( 2 ) to measure the temperature effects on the header of RIL population across two seasons in two old ages under natural field conditions, by ciphering day-to-day temperatures and twenty-four hours lengths ; and ( 3 ) to place the temperature-driven HD QTLs utilizing effectual cumulative temperature ( ECT ) as a trait.


Heading day of the months of parents under different photoperiod and temperature conditions

ZS97 and ZZ18 workss were grown in growing Chamberss with different combinations of photoperiod and temperature interventions. In high-temperature interventions, HDs for ZS97 were 64 yearss and 65 yearss under SD and LD conditions, severally, and those for ZZ18 were 73 yearss and 75 yearss under the same conditions ( Figure 1 ; Table 1 ) , bespeaking that both the parents are insensitive to photoperiod. The HD of ZS97 was 9 yearss earlier than that of ZZ18 under SD conditions and 10 yearss earlier under LD conditions. In the low-temperature interventions, HDs for ZS97 were 86 yearss and 88 yearss under SD and LD conditions, severally, and those for ZZ18 were 96 yearss and 97 yearss under the same conditions ( Figure 1 ; Table 1 ) .

The HD of ZS97 was 10 yearss earlier than that of ZZ18 under SD conditions and 9 yearss earlier under LD conditions.The SD publicity rates of ZS97 and ZZ18 in the high-temperature interventions were 1.56 % and 2.66 % , severally, and 2.27 % and 1.03 % in the low-temperature interventions ( Table 1 ) .

The high-temperature publicity rates of ZS97 and ZZ18 under SD conditions were 25.6 % and 23.9 % , severally, and 26.1 % and 22.6 % under LD conditions ( Table 1 ) .

Temperature had important effects on ECT and HD, no important photoperiod effects and interactions between temperature and photo-period was detected utilizing bipartisan analysis of discrepancy ( Table 2 )

Photoperiod and temperature fluctuations in field experiments

In experiments 1 and 3, the twenty-four hours length ranged from 13.5 to 14.5 H during the period from seeding to blooming ( 18 May to 14 August ) , closely fiting the LD conditions. In experiments 2 and 4 ( late turning seasons ) , twenty-four hours length bit by bit decreased from 13.5 to 11.5 H from seeding to blooming ( 5 July to 28 September ) , which tended to be SD conditions.Temperature was besides recorded daily, and the temperature curves show fluctuations in both seasons in the two old ages ( Figure 2 ) . In experiment 1, an norm of 25 & A ; deg ; C with a lower limit of 20 & A ; deg ; C and a upper limit of 30 & A ; deg ; C was recorded.

Whereas in experiment 3, an norm of about 27 & A ; deg ; C ( higher than in experiment 1 ) with a lower limit of 18 & A ; deg ; C and a upper limit of 32 & A ; deg ; C was recorded. In experiments 2 and 4 ( July to September ) , the minimal temperature recorded was 22 & A ; deg ; C and the upper limit was 33 & A ; deg ; C, with an norm of 28 & A ; deg ; C. Thus, the mean temperatures from seeding to heading in experiments 2 and 4 were higher than those in experiments 1 and 3.

Dayss to heading

In experiments 1 and 3, mean HDs of ZS97 and ZZ18 were 64 and 73 yearss and 62 and 72 yearss, severally ; HDs of the RIL population ranged from 59.8 to 87.1 yearss and 57.3 to 85 yearss, severally. In experiments 2 and 4, mean HDs of ZS97 and ZZ18 were 60 and 71 yearss and 60 and 70 yearss, severally ; HDs ranged from 54.7 to 80 yearss and 55 to 81.8 yearss for the RIL population ( Table 3 ) .

Effective cumulative temperature

Electroconvulsive therapies were 1109 & A ; deg ; C for ZS97 and 1266 & A ; deg ; C for ZZ18, with a scope of 1025.

9 to 1534.7 & A ; deg ; C in the population, and 1140 & A ; deg ; C and 1292 & A ; deg ; C, with a scope of 1051.1 to 1429.1 & A ; deg ; C, in experiments 1 and 2, severally.

In experiments 3 and 4, ECTs for ZS97 and ZZ18 were 1102 & A ; deg ; C and 1235 & A ; deg ; C, with a scope of 1045.3 to 1502.5 & A ; deg ; C in the population, and 1130 & A ; deg ; C and 1261 & A ; deg ; C, with a scope of 1070.2 to 1437.4 & A ; deg ; C ( Table 3 ) .

Polymorphism between parents

A sum of 908 SSR markers distributed over the 12 chromosomes were used to place polymorphism between the parents. Of them, 75 polymorphous markers were observed on 11 chromosomes, except on chromosome 8. The polymorphous ratio of 8.25 % indicated that both parents were genetically closely related. These markers were used for the genotypic analysis of the whole population.The familial linkage map was hard to develop for chromosomes holding fewer polymorphous markers.

Single marker analysis was performed for QTL sensing utilizing all chromosomes. However, the marker orders used to make the linkage map were assumed based on the published rice genome RM marker orders [ 25 ] , [ 26 ] . One million bases on a rice chromosome is about tantamount to 4 centimeters [ 26 ] ; utilizing this relationship, the published physical distances between markers ( hypertext transfer protocol: //www.gramene.org ) were used to gauge approximative familial distances on chromosome 7. Familial linkage maps were developed for chromosomes 10, 11, and 12, with eight or more polymorphous markers.

Interval mapping method was conducted for QTL sensing with these three chromosomes.

Location of QTLs

The lopsidedness and kurtosis values ( Table 3 ) of HD and ECT in the RIL population were all less than 1.0 in absolute value, proposing that both these traits about fit normal distributions and the information for the traits are suited for QTL function.QTLs for HD and ECT were normally identified in the four experiments ( Tables 4 and 5 ) and termed qEHD ( ECT-driven HD QTL ) . Harmonizing to individual marker analysis, QTLs were detected on chromosomes 7, 10, 11, and 12.

qEHD7 was identified near marker RM473 on chromosome 7 in experiment 1, and qEHD11 was near marker RM5349 on chromosome 11 in experiment 1. The QTL qEHD12 near marker RM6837 on chromosome 12 was detected merely in experiment 2, whereas qEHD10 was normally detected near marker RM1375 on chromosome 10 ( P & A ; lt ; 0.001 in all the four experiments ) .Using the interval function method, merely one QTL was detected in each experiment on chromosome 10. Their 1 – LOD assurance intervals largely overlapped, bespeaking there was one common QTL, qEHD10, detected in all four experiments ( Figure 3 ) .

This QTL explained HD fluctuation of 39.8 % to 59.4 % , with LOD values of more than 17 ( Table 5 ) .

Sequencing analysis of photoperiod-sensitive cistrons in ZS97 and ZZ18

qEHD10 was located in the adjacent parts of Ehd1 and Ehd2 on chromosome 10. In order to find their relationships to qEHD10, we sequenced the Ehd1 and Ehd2 allelomorphs of ZS97 and ZZ18. Sequencing analysis of Ehd1 showed a few single-base permutations in coding DNAs 1 and 4 but non in coding DNAs 2 and 3 ( Figure S1A ) .

In ZS97, SNPs were found at 130, 160, and 224 bp off from ATG, and two SNPs occurred in coding DNA 4. In ZZ18, three SNPs were found at 83, 224, and 226 bp off from ATG, and two SNPs occurred in coding DNA 4. The protein sequences of both parents have 256 aminic acids, as in Nipponbare, except for little alterations in 5 amino acids, demoing that the parents carried functional allelomorphs ( Supporting Information Fig.

S1B ) . The sequencing analysis of Ehd2 showed no sequence difference between ZS97 and ZZ18 in both booster and coding part ( Figure S2A ) . However, the analysis revealed an SNP at 26 bp from exon 4 when compared with Nipponbare, whereas the amino acid sequence had no difference among the three cultivars ( Figure S2B ) .


Growth temperature determines heading day of the month

Electroconvulsive therapy from seeding to heading for the parents were consistent in whatever conditions they were grown. The ECTs of ZS97 and ZZ18 were fluctuated around 1110 and 1260 & A ; deg ; C, in the four field environments severally.

Probably indicated, 1110 and 1260 & A ; deg ; C were the threshold ECTs, which the workss must obtain before they begin blooming. Thus HDs for the two parents were mostly associated with temperature. For the population, yearss to heading was less in experiments 2 and 4 compared to experiments 1 and 3 ( Table 3 ) , in which the norm temperatures during the period from seeding to blooming were lower than in experiments 2 and 4 ( Figure 2 ) .

However, the average ECTs of the population were similar among the four experiments, with little differences that were likely due to the minor mistake in computations of three-time-point average temperature, Particularly, ECTs of the population had no important difference between experiments in LD ( experiments 1 and 3 ) and SD trended conditions ( experiments 2 and 4 ) . These findings indicate that temperature played a cardinal function in commanding HD in the population.In order to corroborate the function of temperature and photoperiod effects on both parents, we performed experiments in growing Chamberss under different temperature and light conditions. Bipartisan analysis of discrepancy showed there was no photoperiod consequence and interaction effects on HD and ECT, but merely temperature had important effects on HD and ECT ( Table 2 ) . Therefore, the photoperiod interventions did non alter heading in the parents at the same temperature conditions. However, the high-temperature intervention promoted early header in any photoperiod conditions, and frailty versa.

HD was controlled by threshold ECTs

To look into the effects of ECT on HD in rice, photoperiod effects and interactions between photoperiod and temperature had better to be excluded. Therefore, HD measuring of a population should be made in good controlled conditions such as growing Chamberss. But, there was non plenty good controlled infinite available to works the big population with 2 replicates.

Hence, in order to keep the changeless photoperiod, we planted the population at the same day of the months in the two seasons in two old ages and the day-to-day mean temperatures were recorded to mensurate the ECT, to normalise fluctuating day-to-day temperatures. Furthermore in this survey, the photoperiod and photoperiod by temperature interaction had no effects on HD of our stuffs. Therefore, our stuffs were suited to analyse temperature consequence on HD in the field.In rice, the reported base temperature for clip to heading varied with different types of theoretical accounts considered, 8 & A ; deg ; C with the nonlinear theoretical account and 10.7 & A ; deg ; C with the additive theoretical account for IR8 [ 27 ] , and with the scope of temperature analyzed, 8.6 & A ; deg ; C in the scope 20 to 28 & A ; deg ; C for IR36 [ 28 ] . Using a nonlinear theoretical account, Gao et Al. [ 29 ] considered a basal temperature of 10 & A ; deg ; C for japonica, 12 & A ; deg ; C for indica, and 13 & A ; deg ; C for intercrossed rice.

Here we considered 10 & A ; deg ; C as a base temperature for the two parents and population. ECT was used to gauge the temperature effects on blooming in helianthus [ 30 ] , wheat [ 31 ] , Arabidopsis [ 32 ] , and rice [ 33 ] , [ 34 ] . It was reported that each photoperiod insensitive genotypes of helianthus and rice has to obtain threshold ECT before blooming [ 35 ] , [ 30 ] . In fact, in China, to guarantee the successful production of intercrossed, heading synchronism of parents of three-line intercrossed system was made by modulating seeding day of the month of parents with ECT as an index [ 36 ] , [ 37 ] . In this survey, the averaged ECTs of both parents, ZS97 and ZZ18 in all the four field experiments was 1115 and 1259 & A ; deg ; C which were near to the values of 1113 and 1264 & A ; deg ; C in growing chamber, although the twenty-four hours lengths and temperatures in the field and growing chamber was different. This suggested that 1110 and 1260 & A ; deg ; C were the threshold ECTs of ZS97 and ZZ18, severally.It was noted that HD and ECT were two sorts of parametric quantities to mensurate heading clip.

Hence, the QTL for ECT and HD located in the same interval should be one QTL. The QTL effects can be explained in two ways. For illustration, in experiment 1, the linear consequence of qEHD10 means the QTL promoted ZZ18 heading up to 9.

6 yearss and ECT to 170 & A ; deg ; C as compared to ZS97 ( Table 5 ) . That is to state, in experiment 1, ECT of 170 & A ; deg ; C took 9.6 yearss, bespeaking that ECT of 19 & A ; deg ; C was required per twenty-four hours.

Familial background of the parents is helpful for QTL sensing

By and large, QTL sensing is based on natural allelomorphic differences between parental lines [ 38 ] . It is expected that utilizing a two-parent population to map QTLs will observe merely limited QTLs, because the cistrons will show merely limited information about polymorphism content. In this survey, the polymorphous per centum was less than 10 % and we could non place any polymorphous markers on chromosome 8, which implied that both parents were extremely genetically related. With the cloning of cardinal blooming cistrons, the photoperiodic tract in rice is good understood.

Two independent blooming tracts were shown to be individually regulated by Ehd1 and Hd1, both of which are upstream of Hd3a, an orthologue of Arabidopsis FT [ 4 ] . To place the position of the parental allelomorphs of the three of import blooming cistrons, comparative sequencing was performed between the parents for Hd3a, Ehd1, and Hd1.The Hd3a protein sequence is the same in both ZS97 and ZZ18.

Compared to Nipponbare, it has one amino acid permutation, but the lengths of the protein sequences are the same, intending this is a functional allelomorph ( Figure S4 ) . Sequencing analysis of the Hd1 venue showed that both ZS97 and ZZ18 contain a 36-bp interpolation 334 bp off from the ATG site, where Nipponbare has a 36-bp omission in exon 1 ( Figure S3A ) . ZS97 has one single-base permutation 531 bp off from ATG. In ZS97 and ZZ18 there is a common SNP at the site of 600 bp off from ATG, and ZS97 has another SNP at 531 bp from ATG in exon 1 every bit good. We speculate that these Hd1 allelomorphs are nonfunctional in the parents because the protein sequence is modified by the add-on of 12 aminic acids and the fluctuation of 2 aminic acids ( Figure S3B ) .

Therefore, it is likely that the Hd1-mediated blossoming tracts, which are controlled by photoperiod, did non map in the parents and the population. Ehd1, a B-type response regulator, is involved in early blossoming under SD conditions and delayed heading under LD conditions independent of hd1 [ 11 ] . ZS97 and ZZ18 carried polymorphous Ehd1 allelomorphs ( Fig. S1A ) , but the two parents did non expressed the phenotype of Ehd1, a cardinal cistron in rice photoperiod blooming tract. qEHD10 detected in this survey was closely linked to Ehd1. Presently, we can non govern out the possibility that qEHD10 is non Ehd1, even though the population does non demo photoperiod response.

Developing near isogenic lines of qEHD10 was under procedure for all right function, in order to supply a clear cogent evidence that qEHD10 is different venue from Ehd1. However, the new findings of temperature promoted HD, riches us the cognition in rice blooming tract.

Functions of ECT in the rice blooming tract

In rice the influence of photoperiod on HD has been extensively researched and is good characterized, whereas the effects of temperature remain ill-defined.

In Arabidopsis, nevertheless, temperature can modulate flowering clip via the vernalization tract [ 24 ] . Vernalization is really of import for winter workss and regulates flowering clip through the publicity or suppression of FLC look. But no homologues of FLC have been identified in rice.HDs of ZS97 and ZZ18 were accelerated at high-temperature interventions under both SD and LD conditions. In contrast, ZS97 and ZZ18 showed no important difference in HD between SD and LD conditions in malice of high temperature or low temperature. This contradicts the conventional behaviour of rice, in which header was inhibited under LD and promoted under SD conditions. These findings suggest that some temperature signals may be apart from the photoperiodic signals that regulate HD. Luan et Al.

[ 39 ] reported that HDs in rice mutation lF1132 were really early at high temperatures under both SD and LD conditions, whereas at low temperatures the HD was delayed significantly under SD but small earlier under LD conditions by the hd1-3 venue on chromosome 6. They reported that HD was delayed at low temperatures due to the suppression of hd3a look by hd1-3. The cistrons involved in the photoperiod tract might be closely linked to the venue of temperature response [ 39 ] .

Lin et Al. [ 40 ] identified the Hd9 venue and proposed a hypothesis that Hd9 is involved in features other than photoperiod sensitiveness. Nakagawa et Al.

[ 34 ] confirmed that Hd9 was involved in thermic response. These consequences are similar to those of the present survey in which qEHD10 was identified near the photoperiod cistron Ehd1 and made response to temperature.Rice growing ( sprouting to heading ) is divided into two separate and distinguishable growing stages, viz. basic vegetive growing stage ( BVG ) and photoperiod-sensitive stage ( PSP ) [ 41 ] , [ 42 ] . Temperature is considered to impact rice heading day of the month by speed uping or retarding BVP [ 41 ] , [ 43 ] .

Poethig [ 44 ] noted the importance of thermic grade yearss when gauging the temperature in the ordinance of stage alteration and developmental timing in workss. In our surveies, low and high temperatures might retard and speed up BVG period. More over in high temperature, the parents accumulated more degree heat everyday and rapidly reached the threshold ECT which led to short HD, and this might be the ground why both parents responded to high temperature in similar mode. In contrast, in low temperature, it took long clip to make the threshold ECT, taking to long HD. Thus qEHD10 map is triggered by ECT threshold point, which finally leads to blossoming and indicating that there might be a fresh tract regulated by temperature to command rice header.

Materials and Methods

Plant stuff and growing chamber conditions for the parents

A population of 168 RILs, produced by seven back-to-back coevalss of single-seed descent from a cross between two elect Oryza sativa L. indica assortments, Zhenshan 97 ( ZS97 ) and Zhongzao 18 ( ZZ18 ) , was used in the present survey.

Controlled photoperiod and temperature experiments were performed on the parents in Conviron PGV 36 type growing Chamberss ( Conviron Ltd. , Winnipeg, Canada ) . ZS97 and ZZ18 were treated with four different growing conditions with two different photoperiods and temperatures: LD, 27.6 & A ; deg ; C ; LD, 22.6 & A ; deg ; C ; SD, 27.6 & A ; deg ; C ; and SD, 22.

6 & A ; deg ; C. The day-length parametric quantities were: LD, 15 H visible radiation and 9 H dark ; SD, 9 H visible radiation and 15 H dark. For both LD and SD conditions, the high-temperature intervention was 27.6 & A ; deg ; C ( norm of 25 & A ; deg ; C for 15 H and 32 & A ; deg ; C for 9 H ) and the low-temperature intervention was 22.6 & A ; deg ; C ( norm of 20 & A ; deg ; C for 15 H and 27 & A ; deg ; C for 9 H ) . The seeds were first sown in a natural field, and 2-week-old seedlings were transferred to the growing Chamberss. A lower limit of 10 workss were investigated for the measuring of HD. The high-temperature publicity rate and the SD publicity rate were calculated by the undermentioned expression [ 39 ] : high-temperature publicity rate ( % ) = [ ( yearss to heading at low temperature ? yearss to heading at high temperature ) /days to heading at low temperature ] -100 and SD publicity rate ( % ) = [ ( yearss to heading under LD ? yearss to heading under SD ) /days to heading under LD ] -100.

Field experimental design

The RIL population together with its parents were sown in two different seasons each twelvemonth in 2007 and 2009, foremost on 18 May ( afterlife referred to as experiment 1 for May 2007 and experiment 3 for May 2009 ) and 2nd on 5 July ( referred to as experiment 2 for July 2007 and experiment 4 for July 2009 ) , at the experimental farm of Huazhong Agricultural University located in Wuhan ( 29 & A ; deg ; 58’N, 113 & A ; deg ; 41’E ) , China. Each field experiment was performed by randomised complete block design with two replicates. Fourteen seedlings of 25-day-old from each line were transplanted into a two-row secret plan, with a distance of 16.5 centimeters between workss within a row and 26.

4 centimeter between the rows. Field direction, including irrigation, fertiliser application, and pest control, followed basically the normal agricultural pattern.

Measurement of heading day of the month and effectual cumulative temperature

HD was recorded as yearss from seeding to the visual aspect of the first panicle for each works. This trait was evaluated for the 10 workss in the center of two rows of each RIL, demuring the fringy workss. The header yearss averaged over the two reproductions within each season was used as the natural information for analysis.The highest, lowest, and average day-to-day temperatures were recorded from the experimental field based on three hourly point computations [ 45 ] . The temperature informations recorded for the four experiments were used to cipher the ECT from the twenty-four hours of seeding to heading of each works in all the RILs among the two reproductions. Averaged ECT of two reproductions was used as the natural information for analysis in each season.

The ECT for each genotype was calculated utilizing the undermentioned equation:, ( 1 )where Ke is the ECT ; Ti is the average temperature on the ith twenty-four hours obtained from the norm of highest and lowest temperature ; and T0 is the developmental nothing temperature or base temperature, the minimal temperature needed for works growing below which development ceases ( 10 & A ; deg ; C for rice ) . ECT for a peculiar HD was calculated by summing the day-to-day ECTs from the twenty-four hours of seeding to the twenty-four hours of heading. The statistical analysis of the phenotype information was conducted utilizing Microsoft Excel 2003 ( Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA ) .

Deoxyribonucleic acid isolation and polymorphous marker showing

Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from fresh foliages at the seedling phase from 168 RIL ( F7 ) workss utilizing the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method [ 46 ] with minor alterations. A sum of 908 SSR markers were used to test the two parents, ZS97 and ZZ18, to place polymorphous markers across the genome. Markers of the RM-series were designed harmonizing to Temnykh et Al. [ 25 ] , [ 47 ] and those of the MRG-series harmonizing to the rice genome sequences of the Monsanto Company [ 48 ] . The SSR check was conducted by polyacrylamide gel cataphoresis, as described by Wu and Tanksley [ 49 ] with minor alterations.

QTL analysis

QTL analysis for HD and ECT was carried out by individual marker analysis, and the analysis fits the information to the undermentioned simple additive arrested development theoretical account:Y = b0 + b1x + vitamin E, ( 2 )where Y is the phenotypic value of a line, b0 is the population mean, b1 is the linear consequence of the venue on the trait, vitamin E is a residuary mistake term and ten is straight related to the genotypic codification at the venue being tested for the line considered. The consequences for b0, b1, and the F statistic for each marker were estimated and indicate whether the marker was linked to a QTL. Linkage analysis was performed by MAPMAKER/EXP package Ver.

3.0b with the Haldane map [ 50 ] and interval function by the MAPMAKER/QTL ver.1.

1b [ 51 ] . A minimal LOD value of 3.0 was selected to corroborate the presence of a QTL in a given genomic part.

Sequencing photoperiod cistrons ( Ghd7, Hd1, Ehd1, Ehd2, and Hd3a )

Promoter and coding parts of each cistron were amplified utilizing LA Taq ( Takara ) from genomic DNA, and PCR merchandises were purified. These purified PCR fragments were sequenced utilizing the Big Dye Terminator v3.

1 Cycle Sequencing Kit ( Applied Biosystems ) . Data were collected utilizing the ABI Prism 3730 DNA Analyzer ( Applied Biosystems ) and interpreted utilizing SEQUENCHER 4.6 ( Gene Codes Corporation ) .


The writers kindly thank farm technician Mr. J.B. Wang for his first-class field work.

Figure fables

Figure 1. Heading day of the months for ZS97 and ZZ18 in different photoperiod and temperature interventions conducted in growing Chamberss.Figure 2.

Temperature fluctuations at the experimental field in 2007 and 2009.Figure 3. Linkage map demoing QTL places in relation to those of antecedently identified QTLs.Figure 4. Heading day of the months among the population in the four experiments.

Table 1. The consequence of photoperiods, average temperatures, and effectual cumulative temperature on heading day of the monthZhenshan 97Zhongzao 18South dakota( vitamin D )LD( vitamin D )Delay( vitamin D ) aSDPR ( % )ECT ( & A ; deg ; C ) BSouth dakota( vitamin D )LD( vitamin D )Delay( vitamin D ) aSDPR ( % )ECT ( & A ; deg ; C ) BHD at 27.6 & A ; deg ; C646511.561126/1144737522.

661284/1320HD at 22.6 & A ; deg ; C868822.271083/1108969711.031209/1222Delay ( vitamin D ) degree Celsius22232322HTPR ( % )25.

626.123.922.6SDPR, short-day publicity rate ; ECT, effectual cumulative temperature ; HD, heading day of the month ; HTPR, high-temperature publicity ratea Delay in HD caused by photoperiodB Effective cumulative temperature under SD/LD conditionshundred Delay in HD caused by temperatureTable 2. Analysis of temperature by photoperiod interaction for HD and ECT in the parentsFactorsHD aElectroconvulsive therapy BFPFPphotoperiod ( P )1.

20.27991.10.3000Temperature ( T )369.7& A ; lt ; 0.


00.9569*PxT photoperiod by temperature interactiona Heading day of the monthB Effective cumulative temeperatureTable 3. Phenotypic analysis of heading day of the month and effectual cumulative temperature in the RIL population of rice across two seasons in two old ages

RIL PopulationExp.TraitsZS97ZZ18Mean ± SDScopeLopsidednessKurtosis1HD ( vitamin D )647369.5 ± 6.159.8-87.10.


ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )110912661204.4 ± 112.51025.9-1534.

70.6-0.572HD ( vitamin D )607166.6 ± 5.654.7-80.10.11-0.


ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )114012921231.7 ± 82.51051.1-1429.10.09-0.

743HD ( vitamin D )627272.3 ± 6.257.3-85.00.05-0.95

ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )110212351247.

3 ± 112.61045.3-1502.50.

15-0.784HD ( vitamin D )607067.7 ± 5.755.0-81.80.34-0.62

ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )113012611216.

9 ± 77.51070.2-1437.40.

44-0.43ZS97, Zhenshan 97 ; ZZ18, Zhongzao 18 ; HD, heading day of the month ; ECT, effectual cumulative temperatureTable 4. QTLs identified in four experiments by individual marker analysisExpTraitQTLMarkerChrAddaPr ( F )1HD ( vitamin D )qEHD7RM4737-1.

7iˆ?0.0001qEHD10RM1375104.1iˆ?0.0001qEHD11RM534911-1.6iˆ?0.001ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD7RM4737-31.

6iˆ?0.0001qEHD10RM13751077.7iˆ?0.0001qEHD11RM534911-27.9iˆ?0.00012HD ( vitamin D )qEHD10RM1375103.9iˆ?0.

0001qEHD12RM6837121.6iˆ?0.003ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD10RM13751057.4iˆ?0.0001qEHD12RM68371224.4iˆ?0.0033HD ( vitamin D )qEHD10RM1375104.6iˆ?0.0001ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD10RM13751050.0iˆ?0.00014HD ( vitamin D )qEHD10RM1375103.5iˆ?0.0001ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD10RM13751052.3iˆ?0.0001a Linear consequence, a positive value means ZZ18 allelomorph with increasing consequenceTable 5. QTL interval function analysis for chromosome 10ExpTraitsQTLTime intervalLODAddaVar ( % ) B1HD ( vitamin D )qEHD10RM1375-RM322922.64.859.4ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD10RM1375-RM322923.185.257.02HD ( vitamin D )qEHD10RM1375-RM322923.33. 948.3ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD10RM1375-RM322923.057.348.03HD ( vitamin D )qEHD10RM1375-RM322920.43.643.2ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD10RM1375-RM322922.155.244.84HD ( vitamin D )qEHD10RM1375-RM322917.63.639.8ECT ( & A ; deg ; C )qEHD10RM1375-RM322919.352.742.2a Linear consequence, a positive value means ZZ18 allelomorph with increasing consequence.B Variance explained by the QTL


I'm Ruth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out